Using Conversational Agents To Support Learning By Teaching

AI-generated keywords: Conversational Agents Educational Field Learning-by-Teaching Curiosity Notebook Student-Centered

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Conversational agents are gaining popularity in the educational field
  • The study focuses on the 'learning-by-teaching' paradigm
  • The Curiosity Notebook application uses conversational interventions to enhance learning experiences
  • The application engages students and offers insights into designing effective conversational agents for education
  • This research contributes to understanding how conversational agents can be used in education
  • Designing agents that support student-centered learning approaches is important
  • Technology can create interactive and engaging learning environments with conversational agents.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nalin Chhibber, Edith Law

7 pages, 2 figures, Presented at Conversational Agents Workshop, CHI 2019 (Glasgow, UK)

Abstract: Conversational agents are becoming increasingly popular for supporting and facilitating learning. Conventional pedagogical agents are designed to play the role of human teachers by giving instructions to the students. In this paper, we investigate the use of conversational agents to support the 'learning-by-teaching' paradigm where the agent receives instructions from students. In particular, we introduce Curiosity Notebook: an educational application that harvests conversational interventions to facilitate students' learning. Recognizing such interventions can not only help in engaging students within learning interactions, but also provide a deeper insight into the intricacies involved in designing conversational agents for educational purposes.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Sep. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1909.13443v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Using Conversational Agents To Support Learning By Teaching," authors Nalin Chhibber and Edith Law explore the use of conversational agents in the educational field. They highlight how these agents are gaining popularity as tools for supporting and facilitating learning. While conventional pedagogical agents typically act as human teachers by providing instructions to students, this study focuses on a different approach called the 'learning-by-teaching' paradigm. In this paradigm, the conversational agent receives instructions from students. The authors introduce an educational application called Curiosity Notebook, which harnesses conversational interventions to enhance students' learning experiences. By recognizing and analyzing these interventions, the application not only engages students within learning interactions but also offers valuable insights into designing effective conversational agents for educational purposes. This research contributes to the growing understanding of how conversational agents can be utilized in education and provides valuable insight into designing such agents that support student-centered learning approaches. Overall, this study underscores the importance of leveraging technology to create interactive and engaging learning environments that empower students through active participation and teaching experiences with conversational agents.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.