GraphSAC: Detecting anomalies in large-scale graphs
Authors: Vassilis N. Ioannidis, Dimitris Berberidis, Georgios B. Giannakis
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- GraphSAC is a novel graph-based sampling and consensus approach for detecting anomalous nodes in large-scale graphs.
- Traditional methods are vulnerable to manipulation by adversaries, but GraphSAC mitigates this vulnerability by randomly selecting subsets of nodes and applying graph-aware criteria to filter out contaminated sets.
- A semi-supervised learning (SSL) module is used to estimate nominal label distributions per node, which are minimally impacted by the presence of anomalous nodes.
- Rigorous performance analysis of GraphSAC provides guarantees by bounding the required number of draws, with complexity per draw growing linearly with the number of edges in the graph for efficient SSL implementation.
- GraphSAC can execute draws in parallel, ensuring scalability to large graphs.
- Experimental evaluations show that GraphSAC outperforms existing state-of-the-art alternatives under various anomaly generation models.
Abstract: A graph-based sampling and consensus (GraphSAC) approach is introduced to effectively detect anomalous nodes in large-scale graphs. Existing approaches rely on connectivity and attributes of all nodes to assign an anomaly score per node. However, nodal attributes and network links might be compromised by adversaries, rendering these holistic approaches vulnerable. Alleviating this limitation, GraphSAC randomly draws subsets of nodes, and relies on graph-aware criteria to judiciously filter out sets contaminated by anomalous nodes, before employing a semi-supervised learning (SSL) module to estimate nominal label distributions per node. These learned nominal distributions are minimally affected by the anomalous nodes, and hence can be directly adopted for anomaly detection. Rigorous analysis provides performance guarantees for GraphSAC, by bounding the required number of draws. The per-draw complexity grows linearly with the number of edges, which implies efficient SSL, while draws can be run in parallel, thereby ensuring scalability to large graphs. GraphSAC is tested under different anomaly generation models based on random walks, clustered anomalies, as well as contemporary adversarial attacks for graph data. Experiments with real-world graphs showcase the advantage of GraphSAC relative to state-of-the-art alternatives.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.