Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERT
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Rodrigo Nogueira, Wei Yang, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jimmy Lin focus on natural language processing using deep neural networks pre-trained via language modeling tasks.
- Introduce innovative variants of the BERT model called monoBERT and duoBERT for document ranking through pointwise and pairwise classification approaches.
- Construct a multi-stage ranking architecture integrating monoBERT and duoBERT to create an end-to-end search system for efficient quality-latency trade-offs and precise control over candidate admission.
- Identify optimal operating points balancing quality and latency metrics through strategic management of the process.
- Conduct extensive experiments on large-scale datasets (MS MARCO and TREC CAR) showing that the proposed models match or surpass existing state-of-the-art solutions in document ranking tasks.
- Perform meticulous ablation studies to dissect contributions of each component within the framework while mapping out the latency/quality tradeoff space.
- Highlight how leveraging advanced neural network architectures like BERT can significantly enhance document ranking processes in natural language processing applications.
Authors: Rodrigo Nogueira, Wei Yang, Kyunghyun Cho, Jimmy Lin
Abstract: The advent of deep neural networks pre-trained via language modeling tasks has spurred a number of successful applications in natural language processing. This work explores one such popular model, BERT, in the context of document ranking. We propose two variants, called monoBERT and duoBERT, that formulate the ranking problem as pointwise and pairwise classification, respectively. These two models are arranged in a multi-stage ranking architecture to form an end-to-end search system. One major advantage of this design is the ability to trade off quality against latency by controlling the admission of candidates into each pipeline stage, and by doing so, we are able to find operating points that offer a good balance between these two competing metrics. On two large-scale datasets, MS MARCO and TREC CAR, experiments show that our model produces results that are either at or comparable to the state of the art. Ablation studies show the contributions of each component and characterize the latency/quality tradeoff space.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.