The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies

Ehsan Toreini; Mhairi Aitken; Kovila Coopamootoo; Karen Elliott; Carlos Gonzalez Zelaya; Aad van Moorsel

The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies

Authors: Ehsan Toreini, Mhairi Aitken, Kovila Coopamootoo, Karen Elliott, Carlos Gonzalez Zelaya, Aad van Moorsel

arXiv: 1912.00782v2 - DOI (cs.CY)

This submission has been accepted in ACM FAT* 2020 Conference

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

AI-generated keywords: Trust AI Machine Learning FEAS Life Cycle

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies explored
Importance of understanding how machine learning technologies impact trust emphasized
Systematic approach proposed to relate social science concepts of trust with AI technologies
Trust conceptualized using ABI framework and mapped onto different technologies
Four categories of machine learning technologies focused on: Fairness, Explainability, Auditability, and Safety (FEAS)
Examination of trust throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems
Introduction of "Chain of Trust" concept to discuss technological needs for trust at different stages
Connection between FEAS and international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks established
Comprehensive analysis provided on how machine learning technologies impact trust in AI-based systems
Insights offered on building trustworthy systems by aligning social science concepts of trust with technological qualities.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: To build AI-based systems that users and the public can justifiably trust one needs to understand how machine learning technologies impact trust put in these services. To guide technology developments, this paper provides a systematic approach to relate social science concepts of trust with the technologies used in AI-based services and products. We conceive trust as discussed in the ABI (Ability, Benevolence, Integrity) framework and use a recently proposed mapping of ABI on qualities of technologies. We consider four categories of machine learning technologies, namely these for Fairness, Explainability, Auditability and Safety (FEAS) and discuss if and how these possess the required qualities. Trust can be impacted throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems, and we introduce the concept of Chain of Trust to discuss technological needs for trust in different stages of the life cycle. FEAS has obvious relations with known frameworks and therefore we relate FEAS to a variety of international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks that have emerged in recent years.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Nov. 2019

Cite this paper (BibTeX)

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today

Save to a collection Log in to save papers in collections

Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium

Citation alerts Premium

For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1912.00782v2

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

This paper explores the relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies. The authors emphasize the importance of understanding how machine learning technologies impact trust in order to build AI-based systems that users and the public can trust. To guide technology developments, they propose a systematic approach that relates social science concepts of trust with the technologies used in AI-based services and products. The authors conceptualize trust using the ABI (Ability, Benevolence, Integrity) framework and map these qualities onto different technologies. They specifically focus on four categories of machine learning technologies: Fairness, Explainability, Auditability, and Safety (FEAS). The paper discusses whether these technologies possess the required qualities for building trust. The concept of trust is examined throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems. The authors introduce the concept of a "Chain of Trust" to discuss technological needs for trust at different stages of the life cycle. This highlights the importance of considering trust not only during system development but also during deployment and maintenance. In addition, the authors relate FEAS to various international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks that have emerged in recent years. By doing so, they establish connections between their proposed approach and existing frameworks, further validating its relevance and applicability. Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how machine learning technologies impact trust in AI-based systems. It offers valuable insights into building trustworthy systems by considering social science concepts of trust and aligning them with specific technological qualities.

Relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies explored
Importance of understanding how machine learning technologies impact trust emphasized
Systematic approach proposed to relate social science concepts of trust with AI technologies
Trust conceptualized using ABI framework and mapped onto different technologies
Four categories of machine learning technologies focused on: Fairness, Explainability, Auditability, and Safety (FEAS)
Examination of trust throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems
Introduction of "Chain of Trust" concept to discuss technological needs for trust at different stages
Connection between FEAS and international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks established
Comprehensive analysis provided on how machine learning technologies impact trust in AI-based systems
Insights offered on building trustworthy systems by aligning social science concepts of trust with technological qualities.

Researchers have studied how trust in artificial intelligence (AI) relates to trustworthy machine learning technologies. They emphasize the importance of understanding how these technologies affect trust. They propose a systematic approach to connect social science concepts of trust with AI technologies. Trust is explained using the ABI framework and applied to different technologies. Four categories of machine learning technologies are focused on: fairness, explainability, auditability, and safety (FEAS). The examination of trust throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems is explored. The "Chain of Trust" concept is introduced to discuss technological needs for trust at different stages. The connection between FEAS and international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks is established. A comprehensive analysis is provided on how machine learning technologies impact trust in AI-based systems. Insights are offered on building trustworthy systems by aligning social science concepts of trust with technological qualities. Definitions- Artificial Intelligence (AI): Technology that enables machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. - Machine Learning: A subset of AI where computers learn from data without being explicitly programmed. - Trustworthy: Describes something or someone that can be relied upon or trusted. - Systematic Approach: A methodical way of doing something by following a set plan or procedure. - Social Science: The study of human society and social relationships. - Conceptualize: To form an idea or concept in one's mind. - Framework: A structure or system used as a guide for organizing ideas or information. - Fairness: Treating everyone equally

Trust in AI and Trustworthy Machine Learning Technologies

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in our lives. As AI-based systems are becoming more complex, it is essential to understand how trust plays a role in the development of these technologies. This paper explores the relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies. The authors emphasize the importance of understanding how machine learning technologies impact trust in order to build AI-based systems that users and the public can trust.

A Systematic Approach for Building Trust

To guide technology developments, the authors propose a systematic approach that relates social science concepts of trust with the technologies used in AI-based services and products. The authors conceptualize trust using the ABI (Ability, Benevolence, Integrity) framework and map these qualities onto different technologies. They specifically focus on four categories of machine learning technologies: Fairness, Explainability, Auditability, and Safety (FEAS). The paper discusses whether these technologies possess the required qualities for building trust.

The Chain of Trust

The concept of trust is examined throughout the life cycle of AI-based systems. The authors introduce the concept of a "Chain of Trust" to discuss technological needs for trust at different stages of the life cycle. This highlights the importance of considering trust not only during system development but also during deployment and maintenance.

Connecting FEAS with Existing Frameworks

In addition, the authors relate FEAS to various international Principled AI policy and technology frameworks that have emerged in recent years. By doing so, they establish connections between their proposed approach and existing frameworks, further validating its relevance and applicability.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how machine learning technologies impact trust in AI-based systems. It offers valuable insights into building trustworthy systems by considering social science concepts of trust and aligning them with specific technological qualities

Created on 11 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

68.6%

A multilevel framework for AI governance

cs.CY

67.4%

How to Assess Trustworthy AI in Practice

cs.CY

64.5%

Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges

cs.CY

63.9%

AI Governance and Ethics Framework for Sustainable AI and Sustainability

cs.CY

63.2%

FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility

cs.CY

62.9%

From the Ground Truth Up: Doing AI Ethics from Practice to Principles

cs.CY

61.5%

Towards Achieving Trust Through Transparency and Ethics (Pre-Print)

cs.CY

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.