A multilevel framework for AI governance
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Importance of developing a governance structure aligned with ethical principles and human values for AI governance
- Guidelines and ethical frameworks for trustworthy AI are not enough without a mediating governance structure
- Proposed multilevel approach involving governments, corporations, and citizens as key stakeholders in AI governance
- Examination of interrelationships through trust dimensions such as competence, integrity, and benevolence
- Practical insights to enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI
- Collaboration among stakeholders necessary for effective AI governance
- Structured framework addressing technical aspects of AI development and societal implications
- Need for proactive measures to govern AI technologies responsibly while upholding ethics and human values
- Important resource for policymakers, researchers, industry professionals, and other stakeholders involved in responsible development and deployment of AI technologies.
Authors: Hyesun Choung, Prabu David, John S. Seberger
Abstract: To realize the potential benefits and mitigate potential risks of AI, it is necessary to develop a framework of governance that conforms to ethics and fundamental human values. Although several organizations have issued guidelines and ethical frameworks for trustworthy AI, without a mediating governance structure, these ethical principles will not translate into practice. In this paper, we propose a multilevel governance approach that involves three groups of interdependent stakeholders: governments, corporations, and citizens. We examine their interrelationships through dimensions of trust, such as competence, integrity, and benevolence. The levels of governance combined with the dimensions of trust in AI provide practical insights that can be used to further enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.