Proton-proton collisional age to order solar wind types
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study explores the properties of a solar wind stream and how they are determined by its source region and transport effects.
- Proton-proton collisional age is considered as an ordering parameter for the solar wind at 1AU and investigated in relation to the solar wind classification scheme developed by Xu & Borovsky (2015).
- A simplified solar wind classification scheme based solely on the proton-proton collisional age is proposed, called PAC solar wind classifier.
- The three basic solar wind types from this categorization cover different regimes in terms of proton-proton collisional age $a_{col,p-p}$.
- Sector-reversal plasma is a combination of particularly slow and dense solar wind and most stream interaction boundaries.
- The study shows that the solar wind is well ordered by the proton-proton collisional age, implying underlying intrinsic relationships between plasma properties, especially proton temperature and magnetic field strength in each plasma regime.
- Most solar wind parameters such as magnetic field strength B and oxygen charge state ratio $n_{O^{7+}}$/$n_{O^{6+}}$ change with the solar activity cycle. Therefore, all solar wind categorization schemes based on threshold values need to be adapted to the solar activity cycle as well.
- The proposed PAC classifier offers a simplified approach for classifying different types of solar winds based on their proton-proton collisional age.
Authors: Verena Heidrich-Meisner, Lars Berger, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber
Abstract: The properties of a solar wind stream are determined by its source region and by transport effects. Independently of the solar wind type, the solar wind measured in situ is always affected by both. We consider the proton-proton collisional age as an ordering parameter for the solar wind at 1AU and explore its relation to the solar wind classification scheme developed by Xu & Borovsky (2015). We use this to show that explicit magnetic field information is not required for this solar wind classification. Based on the observation that the three basic solar wind types from this categorization cover different regimes in terms of proton-proton collisional age $a_{col,p-p}$ , we propose a simplified solar wind classification scheme that is only based on the proton-proton collisional age. The resulting so-called PAC solar wind classifier is an alternative to the full Xu & Borovsky (2015) solar wind classification scheme and leads to a classification that is very similar to the full Xu & Borovsky (2015) scheme. The solar wind is well ordered by the proton-proton collisional age. This implies underlying intrinsic relationships between the plasma properties, in particular, proton temperature and magnetic field strength in each plasma regime. We argue that sector-reversal plasma is a combination of particularly slow and dense solar wind and most stream interaction boundaries. Most solar wind parameters (e.g., the magnetic field strength, B, and the oxygen charge state ratio $n_{O^{7+}}$ /$n_{O^{6+}}$) change with the solar activity cycle. Thus, all solar wind categorization schemes based on threshold values need to be adapted to the solar activity cycle as well.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.