Design-unbiased statistical learning in survey sampling

AI-generated keywords: Survey Sampling

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Design-consistent model-assisted estimation is the standard practice in survey sampling
  • Lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework integrating modern machine-learning techniques
  • Proposed approach aims to develop a statistical learning theory for design-unbiased estimation using linear and non-linear prediction models
  • Rich auxiliary information can significantly improve efficiency compared to traditional linear model-assisted methods
  • Methodology ensures valid estimation for the target population and robustness against mis-specifications of assisting models at the individual level
  • Sande and Zhang's work represents a significant advancement in survey sampling methodology, showcasing potential for more powerful assisting models through integration of cutting-edge machine-learning techniques
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Luis Sanguiao Sande, Li-Chun Zhang

Abstract: Design-consistent model-assisted estimation has become the standard practice in survey sampling. However, a general theory is lacking so far, which allows one to incorporate modern machine-learning techniques that can lead to potentially much more powerful assisting models. We propose a subsampling Rao-Blackwell method, and develop a statistical learning theory for exactly design-unbiased estimation with the help of linear or non-linear prediction models. Our approach makes use of classic ideas from Statistical Science as well as the rapidly growing field of Machine Learning. Provided rich auxiliary information, it can yield considerable efficiency gains over standard linear model-assisted methods, while ensuring valid estimation for the given target population, which is robust against potential mis-specifications of the assisting model at the individual level.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Mar. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2003.11423v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of survey sampling, design-consistent model-assisted estimation has become the standard practice. However, a comprehensive theoretical framework that integrates modern machine-learning techniques to enhance assisting models is currently lacking. The proposed approach aims to develop a statistical learning theory that enables design-unbiased estimation using both linear and non-linear prediction models. By leveraging insights from Statistical Science and Machine Learning, the authors demonstrate how rich auxiliary information can significantly improve efficiency compared to traditional linear model-assisted methods. Importantly, their methodology ensures valid estimation for the target population while also offering robustness against potential mis-specifications of the assisting model at the individual level. Sande and Zhang's work represents a significant advancement in survey sampling methodology, showcasing the potential for more powerful assisting models through the integration of cutting-edge machine-learning techniques. Their research not only contributes to enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of estimation processes but also lays the foundation for further exploration at the intersection of statistical science and machine learning within survey sampling practices.
Created on 04 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.