Everything, Everywhere All in One Evaluation: Using Multiverse Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Model Design Decisions on Algorithmic Fairness

AI-generated keywords: Algorithmic Decision Making Multiverse Analysis Fairness Outcomes Design Decisions Interdisciplinary Approach

AI-generated Key Points

  • Algorithmic decision making (ADM) systems can offer objective decisions and save resources
  • ADM systems can also lead to unfair outcomes that discriminate against certain societal groups
  • Biases in data can be either mitigated or reinforced throughout the modeling process of ADM systems
  • Multiverse analysis is a method proposed for algorithmic fairness, involving turning implicit design decisions into explicit ones and examining their implications for fairness
  • Metrics of fairness and performance are computed for each universe created through different decision combinations in multiverse analysis
  • Design decisions during the development of a machine learning system can have surprising effects on its fairness
  • Multiverse analysis helps detect these effects and gain insights into the variability and robustness of algorithmic fairness
  • Transparency in ADM system design and implementation is important to ensure fair outcomes
  • Multiverse analysis can facilitate discussions between developers and stakeholders on the design of ADM systems
  • Collaboration between different disciplines, such as psychology, is needed to address challenges in algorithmic fairness.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jan Simson, Florian Pfisterer, Christoph Kern

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: A vast number of systems across the world use algorithmic decision making (ADM) to (partially) automate decisions that have previously been made by humans. When designed well, these systems promise more objective decisions while saving large amounts of resources and freeing up human time. However, when ADM systems are not designed well, they can lead to unfair decisions which discriminate against societal groups. The downstream effects of ADMs critically depend on the decisions made during the systems' design and implementation, as biases in data can be mitigated or reinforced along the modeling pipeline. Many of these design decisions are made implicitly, without knowing exactly how they will influence the final system. It is therefore important to make explicit the decisions made during the design of ADM systems and understand how these decisions affect the fairness of the resulting system. To study this issue, we draw on insights from the field of psychology and introduce the method of multiverse analysis for algorithmic fairness. In our proposed method, we turn implicit design decisions into explicit ones and demonstrate their fairness implications. By combining decisions, we create a grid of all possible "universes" of decision combinations. For each of these universes, we compute metrics of fairness and performance. Using the resulting dataset, one can see how and which decisions impact fairness. We demonstrate how multiverse analyses can be used to better understand variability and robustness of algorithmic fairness using an exemplary case study of predicting public health coverage of vulnerable populations for potential interventions. Our results illustrate how decisions during the design of a machine learning system can have surprising effects on its fairness and how to detect these effects using multiverse analysis.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.16681v1

In this study, the authors explore the use of algorithmic decision making (ADM) systems and their potential impact on fairness. ADM systems can offer more objective decisions and save resources but can also lead to unfair outcomes that discriminate against certain societal groups. The downstream effects of these systems depend on design decisions made during their development as biases in data can be either mitigated or reinforced throughout the modeling process. To address this issue, the authors propose a method called multiverse analysis for algorithmic fairness. This approach involves turning implicit design decisions into explicit ones and examining their implications for fairness by combining different decisions to create a grid of all possible "universes" of decision combinations. For each universe, metrics of fairness and performance are computed to understand how specific design choices impact fairness. Through a case study focused on predicting public health coverage for vulnerable populations, the authors demonstrate how various design decisions during the development of a machine learning system can have surprising effects on its fairness. By using multiverse analysis they are able to detect these effects and gain insights into the variability and robustness of algorithmic fairness. The results emphasize the importance of explicitly considering design decisions in ADM systems and understanding how they influence fairness outcomes. Additionally, it is argued that multiverse analysis can inform discussions between developers and stakeholders facilitating joint reflections on the ultimate design of ADM systems. This study highlights the need for transparency in ADM system design and implementation to ensure fair outcomes while demonstrating the feasibility of adapting methods from different disciplines such as psychology to address challenges in algorithmic fairness. It is hoped that this interdisciplinary approach will inspire further collaboration and exchange of ideas between research fields.
Created on 11 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.