Optimal supply chains and power sector benefits of green hydrogen

AI-generated keywords: Green hydrogen decarbonization transportation sector power sector co-optimization model

AI-generated Key Points

  • Green hydrogen has the potential to decarbonize parts of the transportation sector
  • Interactions between green hydrogen and the power sector are not well understood
  • Lack of understanding hinders analysis of benefits and challenges related to integrating variable renewables and different hydrogen production/distribution options
  • Researchers conducted a comprehensive study using an open-source co-optimization model to address this gap
  • Study is a novel contribution by conducting first full co-optimization of different hydrogen supply chains and power sector
  • Trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility for different hydrogen supply chains was investigated by varying assumptions on future demand and renewable energy shares
  • Analysis considered optimal capacity, dispatch outcomes in power sector, utilizing DIETER model for cost minimization and considering various constraints
  • Trade-off identified: small-scale electrolysis more energy-efficient but less flexible for lower renewables/hydrogen shares; large-scale supply chains become important with increased renewable shares for storage flexibility
  • Research provides insights into how different hydrogen supply chain options impact power sector dynamics and contribute to reducing renewable surplus generation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Fabian Stockl, Wolf-Peter Schill, Alexander Zerrahn

Scientific Reports, 92511 (2021)
arXiv: 2005.03464v5 - DOI (physics.soc-ph)
This version includes a few minor editorial corrections and a change of the title in order to perfectly resemble the version published in Scientific Reports
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Green hydrogen can help to decarbonize parts of the transportation sector, but its power sector interactions are not well understood. It may contribute to integrating variable renewable energy sources if production is sufficiently flexible in time. Using an open-source co-optimization model of the power sector and four options for supplying hydrogen at German filling stations, we find a trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility: for lower shares of renewables and hydrogen, more energy-efficient and less flexible small-scale on-site electrolysis is optimal. For higher shares of renewables and/or hydrogen, more flexible but less energy-efficient large-scale hydrogen supply chains gain importance as they allow disentangling hydrogen production from demand via storage. Liquid hydrogen emerges as particularly beneficial, followed by liquid organic hydrogen carriers and gaseous hydrogen. Large-scale hydrogen supply chains can deliver substantial power sector benefits, mainly through reduced renewable surplus generation. Energy modelers and system planners should consider the distinct flexibility characteristics of hydrogen supply chains in more detail when assessing the role of green hydrogen in future energy transition scenarios.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Apr. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.03464v5

Green hydrogen has the potential to play a significant role in decarbonizing parts of the transportation sector. However, its interactions with the power sector are not well understood. This lack of understanding hinders a thorough analysis of the benefits and challenges associated with integrating variable renewables and different hydrogen production and distribution options. To address this gap, a team of researchers conducted a comprehensive study using an open-source co-optimization model that considers various scenarios involving future hydrogen demand and the share of renewable energy sources. The study represents a novel contribution to the existing literature by conducting the first full co-optimization of different hydrogen supply chains and the power sector. By systematically varying assumptions on future hydrogen demand and renewable energy shares, the researchers were able to investigate the trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility for different hydrogen supply chains. The analysis also examined how these factors interacted with optimal capacity and dispatch outcomes in the power sector. The researchers utilized an established open-source power sector model called DIETER, which has been previously used for analyzing renewable energy integration and storage options. The model minimizes total system costs by considering annualized investment costs, hourly variable costs of electricity generation, storage technologies, electrolysis, as well as storage, conversion, and transportation of hydrogen. Constraints such as market balances for electricity and hydrogen supply are taken into account along with capacity limits for generation and investment. The results of the study highlight that there is a trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility when it comes to choosing between small-scale on-site electrolysis or large-scale hydrogen supply chains. For lower shares of renewables and hydrogen, more energy-efficient but less flexible small-scale electrolysis may be optimal. However, as renewable energy shares increase, more flexible large-scale hydrogen supply chains become important as they allow for disentangling production from demand through storage. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how different hydrogen supply chain options can impact power sector dynamics and contribute to reducing renewable surplus generation. Energy modelers and system planners should consider these findings when assessing the role of green hydrogen in future energy transition scenarios.
Created on 15 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.