AI summary · arXiv: 2005.11401v4 · cs.CL

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks

Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis,

and 4 more authorsWen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Douwe Kiela

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2020 Accepted at NeurIPS 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Large pre-trained language models have limitations in accessing and manipulating knowledge for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks
  • Authors propose a general-purpose fine-tuning recipe for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models
  • RAG models combine pre-trained parametric memory with non-parametric memory accessed through a pre-trained neural retriever
  • Two formulations of RAG are compared: one with the same retrieved passages throughout the generated sequence, and another allowing different passages per token
  • RAG models achieve state-of-the-art performance on three open domain question answering tasks, outperforming other models
  • For language generation tasks, RAG models generate more specific, diverse, and factual language compared to baseline models
  • Incorporating both parametric and non-parametric memory enhances the capabilities of pre-trained language models
  • RAG models offer potential solutions for addressing limitations in accessing and manipulating knowledge effectively

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pre-trained Language Models Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks Parametric Memory Non-Parametric Memory

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this paper, the authors address the limitations of large pre-trained language models in accessing and manipulating knowledge for knowledge-intensive natural language processing (NLP) tasks. While these models have been successful in storing factual knowledge and achieving state-of-the-art results on downstream tasks, their ability to precisely manipulate knowledge is still limited compared to task-specific architectures. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose a general-purpose fine-tuning recipe for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models. These models combine pre-trained parametric memory (a seq2seq model) with non-parametric memory (a dense vector index of Wikipedia) accessed through a pre-trained neural retriever. The authors compare two formulations of RAG: one that conditions on the same retrieved passages throughout the generated sequence, and another that allows different passages per token. The authors evaluate their models on various knowledge-intensive NLP tasks and achieve state-of-the art performance on three open domain question answering tasks, outperforming both parametric seq2seq models and task specific retrieve and extract architectures. For language generation tasks, RAG models generate more specific, diverse, and factual language compared to a state of the art parametric only seq2seq baseline. Overall, this paper introduces a novel approach to enhancing the capabilities of pre trained language models by incorporating both parametric and non parametric memory. The proposed RAG models demonstrate improved performance on knowledge intensive NLP tasks and offer potential solutions for addressing the limitations of existing language models in accessing and manipulating knowledge effectively.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.