Predicting Future Sales of Retail Products using Machine Learning
Authors: Devendra Swami, Alay Dilipbhai Shah, Subhrajeet K B Ray
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors: Devendra Swami, Alay Dilipbhai Shah, Subhrajeet K B Ray
- Study focus: Application of machine learning techniques to forecast future sales using present and past data
- Dataset: Daily sales data from 1C Company, a large Russian software firm
- Objective: Predict total sales for each product and store in the upcoming month using historical data
- Approaches used: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM)
- Evaluation method: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) between actual and predicted values
- Findings: XGBoost outperforms LSTM due to higher sparsity in the dataset
- Significance: Highlights the importance of leveraging machine learning models for predictive analytics in retail settings
- Benefits: Enhanced forecasting accuracy, informed decisions on inventory management and marketing strategies
Abstract: Techniques for making future predictions based upon the present and past data, has always been an area with direct application to various real life problems. We are discussing a similar problem in this paper. The problem statement is provided by Kaggle, which also serves as an ongoing competition on the Kaggle platform. In this project, we worked with a challenging time-series dataset consisting of daily sales data, kindly provided by one of the largest Russian software firms - 1C Company. The objective is to predict the total sales for every product and store in the next month given the past data. In order to perform forecasting for next month, we have deployed eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) based network architecture to perform learning task. Root mean squared error (RMSE) between the actual and predicted target values is used to evaluate the performance, and make comparisons between the deployed algorithms. It has been found that XGBoost fared better than LSTM over this dataset which can be attributed to its relatively higher sparsity.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.