Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2009.13175v1

In this paper, Prathamesh Saraf, Manan Gupta, and Alivelu Manga Parimi present a comparative study between two controllers for a linearized quadrotor model: the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), a classical controller, and the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an optimal controller. The authors derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws to simplify the otherwise complicated dynamic model of a quadrotor. This derivation provides equations that govern the motion of a quadrotor in both the body frame and inertial frame. A state-space model is developed from these equations which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor. The authors compare the performance of PID and LQR controllers under identical initial conditions using Simulink simulations. While both controllers show satisfactory responses, LQR proves to be more robust for a quadrotor. The study highlights that LQR is an optimal control regulator that can provide better performance than classical controllers like PID. Overall, this paper presents valuable insights into controlling quadrotors using different types of controllers. The results suggest that optimal control regulators like LQR can offer better performance than classical controllers in certain scenarios. The authors' approach of deriving a simplified mathematical model using fundamental principles of physics can also be useful for researchers working on similar problems in robotics and control systems engineering.

• - The paper presents a comparative study between two controllers for a linearized quadrotor model: PID and LQR.
• - The authors derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws to simplify the dynamic model of a quadrotor.
• - A state-space model is developed from these equations which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor.
• - The authors compare the performance of PID and LQR controllers under identical initial conditions using Simulink simulations.
• - LQR proves to be more robust for a quadrotor than PID, highlighting that it is an optimal control regulator that can provide better performance than classical controllers like PID.
• - Optimal control regulators like LQR can offer better performance than classical controllers in certain scenarios.
• - The approach of deriving a simplified mathematical model using fundamental principles of physics can also be useful for researchers working on similar problems in robotics and control systems engineering.

The paper talks about two ways to control a flying machine called a quadrotor: PID and LQR. The authors made some math equations to make it easier to understand how the quadrotor moves. They used these equations to test both controllers and see which one works better. They found out that LQR is better than PID because it can control the quadrotor more accurately. This is important for people who work with robots and machines that need precise movements.

Exploring the Performance of PID and LQR Controllers for Quadrotors

Robotics and control systems engineering have become increasingly important in recent years, with the development of autonomous vehicles and robots. In this paper, Prathamesh Saraf, Manan Gupta, and Alivelu Manga Parimi present a comparative study between two controllers for a linearized quadrotor model: the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), a classical controller, and the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an optimal controller.

Deriving a Mathematical Model

The authors derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws to simplify the otherwise complicated dynamic model of a quadrotor. This derivation provides equations that govern the motion of a quadrotor in both the body frame and inertial frame. A state-space model is developed from these equations which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor.

Comparing Controller Performance

The authors compare the performance of PID and LQR controllers under identical initial conditions using Simulink simulations. While both controllers show satisfactory responses, LQR proves to be more robust for a quadrotor. The study highlights that LQR is an optimal control regulator that can provide better performance than classical controllers like PID.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents valuable insights into controlling quadrotors using different types of controllers. The results suggest that optimal control regulators like LQR can offer better performance than classical controllers in certain scenarios. The authors' approach of deriving a simplified mathematical model using fundamental principles of physics can also be useful for researchers working on similar problems in robotics and control systems engineering.