Mobile Robot Path Planning in Dynamic Environments: A Survey
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Comprehensive survey of path planning methods for mobile robots in densely populated dynamic environments
- Examination of global and local path planning components of navigation framework
- Discussion of recent progress in path planning methods, including strengths and weaknesses
- Velocity Obstacle method and its variants highlighted as effective local planners
- Reinforcement learning-based path planning algorithms detailed as widely used model-free method in current robot applications
- Authors: Kuanqi Cai, Chaoqun Wang, Jiyu Cheng, Clarence W De Silva, and Max Q.-H. Meng
Authors: Kuanqi Cai (Fellow, IEEE), Chaoqun Wang (Fellow, IEEE), Jiyu Cheng (Fellow, IEEE), Clarence W De Silva (Fellow, IEEE), Max Q. -H. Meng (Fellow, IEEE)
Abstract: There are many challenges for robot navigation in densely populated dynamic environments. This paper presents a survey of the path planning methods for robot navigation in dense environments. Particularly, the path planning in the navigation framework of mobile robots is composed of global path planning and local path planning, with regard to the planning scope and the executability. Within this framework, the recent progress of the path planning methods is presented in the paper, while examining their strengths and weaknesses. Notably, the recently developed Velocity Obstacle method and its variants that serve as the local planner are analyzed comprehensively. Moreover, as a model-free method that is widely used in current robot applications, the reinforcement learning-based path planning algorithms are detailed in this paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.