The infrared-radio correlation of star-forming galaxies is strongly M$_{\star}$-dependent but nearly redshift-invariant since z$\sim$4
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study focuses on the infrared-radio correlation (IRRC) in star-forming galaxies
- IRRC is used as a calibration tool for estimating star formation rates (SFR) based on radio emission
- The authors re-calibrate the IRRC by considering both stellar mass and redshift
- They analyze a sample of over 400,000 star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field
- Stacked deep infrared/sub-mm and radio images are used within each bin defined by stellar mass and redshift
- The results show that the IRRC primarily depends on stellar mass, with more massive galaxies exhibiting lower q$_{TIR}$ values (the logarithm of the IRRC)
- There is also a weaker secondary dependence on redshift
- An analytical expression is provided to describe this relationship: q$_{TIR}$(M$_{*}$,z)=(2.646±0.024)×(1+z)^(-0.023±0.008)-(0.148±0.013)×(log M_{*}/M_{\odot}-10)
- When accounting for the UV dust-uncorrected contribution to total SFR, there is a further steepening of the q$_{TIR}$ dependence on stellar mass
- These findings highlight the need for novel M$_{*}$ dependent recipes when using radio emission as a proxy for SFR
Authors: I. Delvecchio, E. Daddi, M. T. Sargent, M. J. Jarvis, D. Elbaz, S. Jin, D. Liu, I. H. Whittam, H. Algera, R. Carraro, C. D'Eugenio, J. Delhaize, B. Kalita, S. Leslie, D. Cs. Molnar, M. Novak, I. Prandoni, V. Smolcic, Y. Ao, M. Aravena, F. Bournaud, J. D. Collier, S. M. Randriamampandry, Z. Randriamanakoto, G. Rodighiero, J. Schober, S. V. White, G. Zamorani
Abstract: Several works in the past decade have used the ratio between total (rest 8-1000$\mu$m) infrared and radio (rest 1.4 GHz) luminosity in star-forming galaxies (q$_{TIR}$), often referred to as the "infrared-radio correlation" (IRRC), to calibrate radio emission as a star formation rate (SFR) indicator. Previous studies constrained the evolution of q$_{TIR}$ with redshift, finding a mild but significant decline, that is yet to be understood. For the first time, we re-calibrate q$_{TIR}$ as a function of both stellar mass (M$_{*}$) and redshift, starting from an M$_{*}$-selected sample of >400,000 star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field, identified via (NUV-r)/(r-J) colours, at redshifts 0.1<z<4.5. Within each (M$_{*}$,z) bin, we stack the deepest available infrared/sub-mm and radio images. We fit the stacked IR spectral energy distributions with typical star-forming galaxy and IR-AGN templates, and carefully remove radio AGN candidates via a recursive approach. We find that the IRRC evolves primarily with M$_{*}$, with more massive galaxies displaying systematically lower q$_{TIR}$. A secondary, weaker dependence on redshift is also observed. The best-fit analytical expression is the following: q$_{TIR}$(M$_{*}$,z)=(2.646$\pm$0.024)$\times$(1+z)$^{(-0.023\pm0.008)}$-(0.148$\pm$0.013)$\times$($\log~M_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$-10). Adding the UV dust-uncorrected contribution to the IR as a proxy for the total SFR, would further steepen the q$_{TIR}$ dependence on M$_{*}$. The lower IR/radio ratio in more massive galaxies could be possibly linked to higher SFR surface density, which induces larger cosmic-ray scale heights. Our findings highlight that using radio emission as a proxy for SFR requires novel M$_{*}$-dependent recipes, that will enable us to convert detections from future ultra deep radio surveys into accurate SFR measurements down to low-SFR, low-M$_{*}$ galaxies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.