Probing the Timescale of the 1.4 GHz Radio emissions as a Star formation tracer
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Radio emissions can be used as a tracer for star formation rate (SFR)
- Advantages of radio emissions over other SFR tracers include being unaffected by dust and pinpointing at sub-arc-second levels
- Interpreting low frequency 1.4 GHz luminosity is challenging due to difficulties in modeling cosmic ray paths in the interstellar medium and their interactions with magnetic fields
- The authors compare SFR derived from radio observations to those derived from spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling using Code Investigating GALaxy Emission (CIGALE) with a non-parametric star formation history model (SFH)
- Approximately 27% of galaxies present a radio SFR at least ten times larger than the instantaneous SFR from SED-fitting, primarily affecting galaxies that show declining SFH activity over the last 300 million years
- Both SFR indicators converge toward a consistent value when SFHs are averaged over periods longer than 150 million years to derive SED-based SFRs
- Low-frequency 1.4 GHz radio is an excellent tracer for star formation activity in galaxies with constant or increasing SFHs, but not reliable for quenching galaxies according to their results
- The sensitivity of low-frequency radio emission as an indicator of star formation time could be longer than 150 million years based on their analysis
Authors: R. C. Arango-Toro, L. Ciesla, O. Ilbert, B. Magnelli, E. F. Jiménez-Andrade, V. Buat
Abstract: Radio used as a star formation rate (SFR) tracer presents enormous advantages by being unaffected by dust and radio sources being pinpointed at the sub-arc-second level. The interpretation of the low frequency 1.4 GHz luminosity is hampered by the difficulty in modeling the cosmic ray paths in the interstellar medium, and their interactions with the magnetic field. In this work, we compare the SFR derived from radio observations, and the ones derived from spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. We aim at better understand the behavior of the SFR radio tracer, with a specific emphasis on the link with star-formation histories. We used the SED modeling code Code Investigating GALaxy Emission, CIGALE, with a non-parametric star formation history model (SFH) and fit the data over the wavelength range from the ultraviolet (UV) up to the mid-infrared (mid-IR). We interpret the difference between radio and SED-based SFR tracers in the light of recent gradients in the derived SFH. To validate the robustness of the results, we checked for any remaining active galaxy nuclei (AGN) contribution and tested the impact of our SFH modeling approach. Approximately 27% our galaxies present a radio SFR (SFR$_{\rm radio}$) at least ten times larger than the instantaneous SFR from SED-fitting (SFR$_{\rm SED}$). This trend affects primarily the galaxies that show a declining SFH activity over the last 300 Myr. Both SFR indicators converge toward a consistent value, when the SFHs are averaged over a period larger than 150 Myr to derive SFR$_{\rm SED}$. Although the radio at low frequency 1.4 GHz is a good tracer of the star formation activity of galaxies with constant or increasing SFH, our results indicate that this is not the case for galaxies that are quenching. Our analysis suggests that the star formation time sensitivity of the radio low frequency could be longer than 150 Myr.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.