Road Damage Detection and Classification with Detectron2 and Faster R-CNN
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Importance of road maintenance for human safety and timely repair
- Evaluation of Detectron2's implementation of Faster R-CNN using various base models and configurations
- Experiments conducted using the Global Road Damage Detection Challenge 2020 dataset
- X101-FPN base model with default configurations is efficient and adaptable
- Achieved F1 scores of 51.0% and 51.4% for test1 and test2 sets, respectively
- Comparison with existing annotations to address discrepancies in prediction results
- Proposed strategies to enhance labeling process for the dataset
- Significance of road damage detection and classification for human safety on roads
- Valuable insights into the effectiveness of Detectron2's implementation in detecting and classifying road damages
- Potential improvements in labeling processes to enhance accuracy in future studies related to road maintenance and safety
Authors: Vung Pham, Chau Pham, Tommy Dang
Abstract: The road is vital for many aspects of life, and road maintenance is crucial for human safety. One of the critical tasks to allow timely repair of road damages is to quickly and efficiently detect and classify them. This work details the strategies and experiments evaluated for these tasks. Specifically, we evaluate Detectron2's implementation of Faster R-CNN using different base models and configurations. We also experiment with these approaches using the Global Road Damage Detection Challenge 2020, A Track in the IEEE Big Data 2020 Big Data Cup Challenge dataset. The results show that the X101-FPN base model for Faster R-CNN with Detectron2's default configurations are efficient and general enough to be transferable to different countries in this challenge. This approach results in F1 scores of 51.0% and 51.4% for the test1 and test2 sets of the challenge, respectively. Though the visualizations show good prediction results, the F1 scores are low. Therefore, we also evaluate the prediction results against the existing annotations and discover some discrepancies. Thus, we also suggest strategies to improve the labeling process for this dataset.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.