Fusion-based quantum computation

AI-generated keywords: FBQC Fusion-based Quantum Computing Fault Tolerance Linear Optical Quantum Computing Ballistic Scheme

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Introduction of fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC)
  • FBQC uses entangling measurements called fusions on qubits of small entangled resource states
  • Proposal of stabilizer formalism for analyzing fault tolerance and computation in FBQC
  • Advantages of FBQC: architectural simplifications, hardware made up of identical modules, low depth of operations on each physical qubit
  • Presentation of two pedagogical examples of fault-tolerant schemes within the FBQC framework
  • Numerical evaluation of threshold under a hardware-agnostic fusion error model and linear optical quantum computing error model
  • Addressing non-determinism of fusion through quantum error correction protocol and other errors in FBQC
  • Higher threshold compared to existing literature by tailoring fault-tolerance framework to the physical system
  • Ballistic scheme presented that can tolerate a 10.4% probability of photon loss in each fusion
  • Demonstrates robustness and potential practicality of FBQC in real-world implementations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sara Bartolucci, Patrick Birchall, Hector Bombin, Hugo Cable, Chris Dawson, Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia, Eric Johnston, Konrad Kieling, Naomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Fernando Pastawski, Terry Rudolph, Chris Sparrow

arXiv: 2101.09310v1 - DOI (quant-ph)

Abstract: We introduce fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC) - a model of universal quantum computation in which entangling measurements, called fusions, are performed on the qubits of small constant-sized entangled resource states. We introduce a stabilizer formalism for analyzing fault tolerance and computation in these schemes. This framework naturally captures the error structure that arises in certain physical systems for quantum computing, such as photonics. FBQC can offer significant architectural simplifications, enabling hardware made up of many identical modules, requiring an extremely low depth of operations on each physical qubit and reducing classical processing requirements. We present two pedagogical examples of fault-tolerant schemes constructed in this framework and numerically evaluate their threshold under a hardware agnostic fusion error model including both erasure and Pauli error. We also study an error model of linear optical quantum computing with probabilistic fusion and photon loss. In FBQC the non-determinism of fusion is directly dealt with by the quantum error correction protocol, along with other errors. We find that tailoring the fault-tolerance framework to the physical system allows the scheme to have a higher threshold than schemes reported in literature. We present a ballistic scheme which can tolerate a 10.4% probability of suffering photon loss in each fusion.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jan. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2101.09310v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper introduces fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC), a model of universal quantum computation in which entangling measurements called fusions are performed on the qubits of small constant-sized entangled resource states. The authors propose a stabilizer formalism for analyzing fault tolerance and computation in these schemes. One of the key advantages of FBQC is that it offers significant architectural simplifications; it enables hardware made up of many identical modules and requires an extremely low depth of operations on each physical qubit, thereby reducing classical processing requirements. The paper presents two pedagogical examples of fault-tolerant schemes constructed within the FBQC framework. The authors numerically evaluate the threshold of these schemes under a hardware-agnostic fusion error model, which includes both erasure and Pauli errors. They also study an error model specific to linear optical quantum computing, considering probabilistic fusion and photon loss. In FBQC, the non-determinism of fusion is directly addressed by the quantum error correction protocol along with other errors. The authors find that tailoring the fault-tolerance framework to the physical system allows for a higher threshold compared to schemes reported in existing literature. The paper concludes by presenting a ballistic scheme that can tolerate a 10.4% probability of suffering photon loss in each fusion; this demonstrates the robustness and potential practicality of FBQC in real-world implementations. Overall, this research contributes to advancing understanding and development of fusion-based quantum computing as a promising approach for achieving fault-tolerant universal quantum computation with simplified architecture and reduced classical processing requirements.
Created on 18 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.