Benchmarking a trapped-ion quantum computer with 29 algorithmic qubits
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Quantum computing field is advancing rapidly with improvements in qubits
- Trapped-ion quantum processors are leading technology due to high-fidelity operations and scalability
- Researchers demonstrate and benchmark IonQ Forte system, a 30-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all operations
- Direct randomized benchmarking conducted at component level across all gate pairs (435 total)
- Application-oriented benchmarks performed on algorithmic qubit benchmarks up to AQ 29
- IonQ Forte system successfully passes benchmarks
- Component-level benchmarking data used to develop system-level model for predicting application benchmarking data
- System-level model generally correlates well with observed performance, but out-of-model errors occur in some cases
- Challenges associated with characterizing larger and higher quality quantum computers highlighted, further work needed to improve performance
- Study demonstrates capabilities of trapped ion quantum computer and provides insights into performance at both component and system levels
Authors: Jwo-Sy Chen, Erik Nielsen, Matthew Ebert, Volkan Inlek, Kenneth Wright, Vandiver Chaplin, Andrii Maksymov, Eduardo Páez, Amrit Poudel, Peter Maunz, John Gamble
Abstract: Quantum computers are rapidly becoming more capable, with dramatic increases in both qubit count and quality. Among different hardware approaches, trapped-ion quantum processors are a leading technology for quantum computing, with established high-fidelity operations and architectures with promising scaling. Here, we demonstrate and thoroughly benchmark the IonQ Forte system: configured here as a single-chain 30-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all operations. We assess the performance of our quantum computer operation at the component level via direct randomized benchmarking (DRB) across all 30 choose 2 = 435 gate pairs. We then show the results of application-oriented benchmarks, indicating that the system passes the suite of algorithmic qubit (AQ) benchmarks up to #AQ 29. Finally, we use our component-level benchmarking to build a system-level model to predict the application benchmarking data through direct simulation, including error mitigation. We find that the system-level model correlates well with the observations in many cases, though in some cases out-of-model errors lead to higher predicted performance than is observed. This highlights that as quantum computers move toward larger and higher-quality devices, characterization becomes more challenging, suggesting future work required to push performance further.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.