Curriculum Learning: A Survey

AI-generated keywords: Curriculum Learning Machine Learning Training Performance Taxonomy

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Curriculum learning involves training models in a specific order, starting from easy samples and gradually progressing to harder ones
  • This approach improves performance compared to randomly shuffling data during training
  • Curriculum learning has been successfully applied across various areas of machine learning and tasks
  • Challenges include ranking samples from easy to hard and determining the appropriate pacing function for introducing more difficult data
  • The survey explores existing literature and discusses how researchers have tackled these challenges
  • Different instantiations of curriculum learning for various machine learning tasks are presented, providing insights into their effectiveness
  • A multi-perspective taxonomy of curriculum learning approaches is constructed, considering various classification criteria
  • A hierarchical tree of curriculum learning methods is developed using an agglomerative clustering algorithm, linking clusters with the taxonomy
  • The survey offers valuable insights into curriculum learning and its potential applications in machine learning
  • Areas for future research and development in this field are identified
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Petru Soviany, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Paolo Rota, Nicu Sebe

Abstract: Training machine learning models in a meaningful order, from the easy samples to the hard ones, using curriculum learning can provide performance improvements over the standard training approach based on random data shuffling, without any additional computational costs. Curriculum learning strategies have been successfully employed in all areas of machine learning, in a wide range of tasks. However, the necessity of finding a way to rank the samples from easy to hard, as well as the right pacing function for introducing more difficult data can limit the usage of the curriculum approaches. In this survey, we show how these limits have been tackled in the literature, and we present different curriculum learning instantiations for various tasks in machine learning. We construct a multi-perspective taxonomy of curriculum learning approaches by hand, considering various classification criteria. We further build a hierarchical tree of curriculum learning methods using an agglomerative clustering algorithm, linking the discovered clusters with our taxonomy. At the end, we provide some interesting directions for future work.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jan. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2101.10382v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Curriculum Learning: A Survey" explores the concept of curriculum learning and its impact on training machine learning models. Curriculum learning involves training models in a specific order, starting from easy samples and gradually progressing to harder ones. This approach has been found to improve performance compared to the standard training method that randomly shuffles data, without incurring additional computational costs. The authors highlight that curriculum learning strategies have been successfully applied across various areas of machine learning and a wide range of tasks. However, one challenge lies in determining how to rank the samples from easy to hard and identifying the appropriate pacing function for introducing more difficult data. These factors can limit the practical application of curriculum approaches. To address these limitations, the survey delves into existing literature and discusses how researchers have tackled these challenges. The authors present different instantiations of curriculum learning for various machine learning tasks, providing insights into their effectiveness. In order to provide a comprehensive overview, the authors construct a multi-perspective taxonomy of curriculum learning approaches by considering various classification criteria. They also develop a hierarchical tree of curriculum learning methods using an agglomerative clustering algorithm, linking the discovered clusters with their taxonomy. Overall, this survey offers valuable insights into curriculum learning and its potential applications in machine learning. It not only presents existing approaches but also identifies areas for future research and development in this field; thus providing guidance on how best to leverage this technique for improved performance in machine learning tasks.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.