Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.09695v1

In the field of software development, maintenance is one of the most significant expenses. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the factors that trigger maintenance and explore if they can be predicted. Previous research has shown that certain methods for assessing the complexity of software programs can be used to develop prediction models for determining the likelihood of maintenance due to software failures. These models are typically established before the release of a software product and often require specific measurements related to object-oriented software. However, it is not always feasible for software developers to have access to these measurements. In this paper titled "Applying Machine Learning Analysis for Software Quality Test," authors Al Khan, Remudin Reshid Mekuria, and Ruslan Isaev propose using machine learning techniques on available data to calculate cumulative levels of software failure. The objective is to develop a technique that can forecast residual defects in software using machine learning, addressing the challenge of predicting such flaws. To gather data for analysis, the authors separate software metrics and defect information from a static source code repository. Software metrics are derived from static code analysis, while reported bugs in the repository provide defect data. By employing a correlation method, metrics that do not have any connection with defect data are eliminated from consideration. This approach allows for comprehensive analysis without interrupting ongoing programming processes. The primary issue faced with large and complex software systems is their inability to be manually controlled entirely, leading to potentially expensive errors. During testing phases, developers may overlook certain errors which subsequently increases maintenance costs. Hence finding an accurate method for forecasting software defects becomes paramount. Overall this paper explores how machine learning can be applied in analyzing available data to predict residual defects in software systems accurately.

• - Maintenance is a significant expense in software development
• - Understanding the factors that trigger maintenance is crucial
• - Certain methods for assessing software complexity can be used to develop prediction models for maintenance due to failures
• - These models require specific measurements related to object-oriented software, which may not always be feasible for developers to have access to
• - The paper proposes using machine learning techniques on available data to calculate cumulative levels of software failure
• - The objective is to develop a technique that can forecast residual defects in software using machine learning
• - Data for analysis is gathered from a static source code repository, with metrics derived from static code analysis and defect data from reported bugs
• - Metrics without any connection to defect data are eliminated through correlation analysis
• - Large and complex software systems are difficult to manually control, leading to potentially expensive errors
• - Finding an accurate method for forecasting software defects is important

Summary: Maintenance is a big expense in making software. It's important to understand what causes maintenance. Some ways to predict maintenance failures use measurements from object-oriented software, but these measurements may not always be available. The paper suggests using machine learning to calculate how likely software is to have problems. They gather data from the code and bugs to find patterns. Definitions- Maintenance: Taking care of something and fixing any problems it has. - Software development: Creating computer programs or applications. - Factors: Things that can affect or influence something. - Predict: Guessing or estimating what will happen in the future. - Object-oriented software: A type of computer program that organizes information into objects. - Feasible: Possible or doable. - Machine learning: When a computer learns and makes decisions without being explicitly programmed by humans. - Cumulative levels: The total amount or quantity over time. - Residual defects: Problems or errors that are left over after trying to fix them. - Static source code repository: A place where the code for a program is stored and can be accessed later on. - Metrics: Measurements or data used for analysis or evaluation. - Correlation analysis: Studying how two things are related to each other.

Using Machine Learning to Predict Software Defects

Software development is a complex and expensive process, with maintenance being one of the most significant expenses. It is therefore important to understand the factors that trigger maintenance and explore if they can be predicted. Previous research has shown that certain methods for assessing the complexity of software programs can be used to develop prediction models for determining the likelihood of maintenance due to software failures. However, these models often require specific measurements related to object-oriented software which may not always be feasible for developers to access. In this paper titled "Applying Machine Learning Analysis for Software Quality Test," authors Al Khan, Remudin Reshid Mekuria, and Ruslan Isaev propose using machine learning techniques on available data in order to calculate cumulative levels of software failure. The goal is to create a technique that can forecast residual defects in software using machine learning, addressing the challenge of predicting such flaws.

Gathering Data For Analysis

The authors begin by separating software metrics and defect information from a static source code repository. Software metrics are derived from static code analysis while reported bugs in the repository provide defect data. By employing a correlation method, metrics that do not have any connection with defect data are eliminated from consideration. This approach allows for comprehensive analysis without interrupting ongoing programming processes.

The Challenge Of Manual Control

The primary issue faced with large and complex software systems is their inability to be manually controlled entirely, leading to potentially expensive errors during testing phases where developers may overlook certain errors which subsequently increases maintenance costs. Hence finding an accurate method for forecasting software defects becomes paramount when it comes to reducing costs associated with maintaining them over time.

Conclusion

Overall this paper explores how machine learning can be applied in analyzing available data in order predict residual defects in software systems accurately without requiring developers or testers access specific measurements related object-oriented programming languages or interrupting ongoing programming processes unnecessarily - making it easier than ever before for teams working on large scale projects involving complex coding structures reduce their overall cost associated with maintaining them over time significantly as well as increase their accuracy when it comes identifying potential issues before they become costly problems down the line..