A Ransomware Classification Framework Based on File-Deletion and File-Encryption Attack Structures

AI-generated keywords: Ransomware Taxonomy Attack Structures Classification Framework Mitigation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Comprehensive framework for classifying ransomware attacks based on file-deletion and file-encryption attack structures
  • Aims to provide a deeper understanding of flaws and inadequacies in ransomware
  • Categorization based on target platform, cryptosystem used, severity of data loss, and attack structure
  • Classification framework considers encryption as a core aspect of the ransomware business model
  • Severity categories range from CAT1 to CAT5, with CAT4 and CAT5 being the most severe
  • Many ransomwares exhibit flaws in their implementation of encryption and deletion attack structures, making data recovery possible without paying the ransom
  • Suggests mitigation strategies for different severity categories (CAT4 and CAT5 through exploiting encryption essentials, CAT3 through reverse engineering)
  • Sections II to VI discuss taxonomy, proposed classification framework, methodology and approach, classification results and analysis, and conclusions respectively
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Aaron Zimba, Mumbi Chishimba, Sipiwe Chihana

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Ransomware has emerged as an infamous malware that has not escaped a lot of myths and inaccuracies from media hype. Victims are not sure whether or not to pay a ransom demand without fully understanding the lurking consequences. In this paper, we present a ransomware classification framework based on file-deletion and file-encryption attack structures that provides a deeper comprehension of potential flaws and inadequacies exhibited in ransomware. We formulate a threat and attack model representative of a typical ransomware attack process from which we derive the ransomware categorization framework based on a proposed classification algorithm. The framework classifies the virulence of a ransomware attack to entail the overall effectiveness of potential ways of recovering the attacked data without paying the ransom demand as well as the technical prowess of the underlying attack structures. Results of the categorization, in increasing severity from CAT1 through to CAT5, show that many ransomwares exhibit flaws in their implementation of encryption and deletion attack structures which make data recovery possible without paying the ransom. The most severe categories CAT4 and CAT5 are better mitigated by exploiting encryption essentials while CAT3 can be effectively mitigated via reverse engineering. CAT1 and CAT2 are not common and are easily mitigated without any decryption essentials.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Feb. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2102.10632v1

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for classifying ransomware attacks based on their file-deletion and file-encryption attack structures. The authors aim to provide a deeper understanding of the flaws and inadequacies exhibited in ransomware, helping victims make informed decisions about whether or not to pay a ransom demand. The paper begins by discussing the taxonomy and threat model associated with ransomware attacks. The categorization of attacks is based on several characteristics, including the target platform, cryptosystem used, severity of data loss, and attack structure. This categorization is independent of the underlying infection vectors. The proposed classification framework considers encryption as a core aspect of the ransomware business model. It classifies ransomware attacks into different categories based on the virulence of the attack and the effectiveness of potential ways to recover data without paying the ransom. The severity categories range from CAT1 to CAT5, with CAT4 and CAT5 being the most severe. The results of the categorization reveal that many ransomwares exhibit flaws in their implementation of encryption and deletion attack structures, making data recovery possible without paying the ransom. The paper suggests that CAT4 and CAT5 can be better mitigated by exploiting encryption essentials, while CAT3 can be effectively mitigated through reverse engineering. On the other hand, CAT1 and CAT2 are less common and easily mitigated without decryption essentials. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section II discusses the taxonomy, threat model, and associated attack structures; Section III presents the proposed classification framework; Section IV describes the methodology and approach; Section V presents classification results and analysis; and finally, Section VI draws conclusions. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into understanding different types of ransomware attacks and offers guidance on how to mitigate their impact effectively.
Created on 28 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.