Machine Learning for Malware Evolution Detection

AI-generated keywords: Malware Antivirus Machine Learning Word2Vec HMM

AI-generated Key Points

  • Malware evolution is a significant challenge for antivirus software
  • Traditional signature-based detection methods can be defeated by advanced forms of malware
  • Machine learning and deep learning techniques are increasingly popular for detecting and analyzing malware
  • Limited research on detecting malware evolution exists
  • The authors explore various machine learning techniques (HMM, HMM2Vec, Word2Vec) for detecting when malware has evolved and requires new countermeasures
  • Experiments are based on mnemonic opcodes extracted from the malware samples
  • HMM-based techniques and Word2Vec provide powerful tools for automatically detecting evolutionary changes in malware
  • Future work may consider other features that are less costly to extract or dynamic features that provide more information about evolutionary trends.
  • Detecting when a malware family has evolved significantly is important so that appropriate countermeasures can be taken.
  • Machine learning techniques offer an automated approach to identifying these changes without requiring labor-intensive manual analysis or reverse engineering.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lolitha Sresta Tupadha, Mark Stamp

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Malware evolves over time and antivirus must adapt to such evolution. Hence, it is critical to detect those points in time where malware has evolved so that appropriate countermeasures can be undertaken. In this research, we perform a variety of experiments on a significant number of malware families to determine when malware evolution is likely to have occurred. All of the evolution detection techniques that we consider are based on machine learning and can be fully automated -- in particular, no reverse engineering or other labor-intensive manual analysis is required. Specifically, we consider analysis based on hidden Markov models (HMM) and the word embedding techniques HMM2Vec and Word2Vec.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.01627v1

The evolution of malware poses a significant challenge to antivirus software, which must adapt to keep up with the changing threat landscape. In this research, the authors explore various machine learning techniques for detecting when malware has evolved and requires new countermeasures. The study involves experiments on a large number of malware families, using hidden Markov models (HMM) and word embedding techniques such as HMM2Vec and Word2Vec. The paper begins by providing background information on different types of malware, including computer worms, viruses, trojans, and backdoors. While traditional signature-based detection methods are effective against known threats, they can be defeated by obfuscation and morphing techniques used by more advanced forms of malware. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have become increasingly popular for detecting and analyzing malware; however, there is limited research on detecting malware evolution. The authors extend previous work in this area by exploring additional learning techniques for automatically detecting evolutionary changes in malware. They find that HMM-based techniques and Word2Vec provide powerful tools for this purpose. The experiments are based on mnemonic opcodes extracted from the malware samples; however, future work may consider other features that are less costly to extract or dynamic features that provide more information about evolutionary trends. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of detecting when a malware family has evolved significantly so that appropriate countermeasures can be taken. Machine learning techniques offer an automated approach to identifying these changes without requiring labor-intensive manual analysis or reverse engineering. The authors suggest several potential avenues for future research in this area.
Created on 15 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.