SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols

AI-generated keywords: Decentralized Exchanges Automated Market Maker DeFi Ecosystem Conservation Function Literature Review

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) with automated market maker (AMM) protocols are an integral part of the DeFi ecosystem.
  • DEXs have gained massive traction due to revived interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology.
  • Unlike traditional centralized exchanges, DEXs do not rely on a central authority to match buy and sell orders.
  • Automated market makers determine asset prices algorithmically through a conservation function.
  • Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert, and Yebo Feng create the first systematization of knowledge in this area by establishing a general AMM framework describing the economics and formalizing the system's state-space representation.
  • The authors systematically compare top AMM protocols' mechanics, illustrating their conservation functions as well as slippage and divergence loss functions.
  • Security and privacy concerns enabled by AMM-based DEXs' inherent properties are discussed along with mitigating solutions.
  • A comprehensive literature review covering both DeFi and conventional market microstructure is conducted.
  • Key differences between centralized exchanges and DEXs are highlighted while also identifying potential areas for future research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert, Yebo Feng

ACM Computing Surveys, 2023
arXiv: 2103.12732v7 - DOI (q-fin.TR)

Abstract: As an integral part of the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) with automated market maker (AMM) protocols have gained massive traction with the recently revived interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT) in general. Instead of matching the buy and sell sides, automated market makers (AMMs) employ a peer-to-pool method and determine asset price algorithmically through a so-called conservation function. To facilitate the improvement and development of automated market maker (AMM)-based decentralized exchanges (DEXs), we create the first systematization of knowledge in this area. We first establish a general automated market maker (AMM) framework describing the economics and formalizing the system's state-space representation. We then employ our framework to systematically compare the top automated market maker (AMM) protocols' mechanics, illustrating their conservation functions, as well as slippage and divergence loss functions. We further discuss security and privacy concerns, how they are enabled by automated market maker (AMM)-based decentralized exchanges (DEXs)' inherent properties, and explore mitigating solutions. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive literature review on related work covering both decentralized finance (DeFi) and conventional market microstructure.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Mar. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2103.12732v7

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) with automated market maker (AMM) protocols have become an integral part of the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. These exchanges have gained massive traction with the recently revived interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT). Unlike traditional centralized exchanges, DEXs do not rely on a central authority to match buy and sell orders. Instead, they employ a peer-to-pool method that allows users to trade directly with liquidity pools. Automated market makers (AMMs), which are at the core of DEXs, determine asset prices algorithmically through a so-called conservation function. To facilitate the improvement and development of AMM-based DEXs, Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert, and Yebo Feng create the first systematization of knowledge in this area. They establish a general AMM framework describing the economics and formalizing the system's state-space representation. The authors then use their framework to systematically compare the top AMM protocols' mechanics, illustrating their conservation functions as well as slippage and divergence loss functions. They further discuss security and privacy concerns enabled by AMM-based DEXs' inherent properties and explore mitigating solutions. In addition to analyzing AMMs' mechanics, the authors conduct a comprehensive literature review covering both DeFi and conventional market microstructure. The review highlights key differences between centralized exchanges and DEXs while also identifying potential areas for future research. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how AMMs work within DEXs while also highlighting potential challenges associated with these systems. As blockchain technology continues to evolve rapidly, understanding how these systems operate will be critical for anyone interested in participating in DeFi markets or developing new blockchain-based applications.
Created on 16 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.