Predictive Modeling of a Lithium Vapor Box Divertor in NSTX-U using SOLPS-ITER
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The lithium vapor box divertor is used to detach the divertor plasma in fusion devices.
- It involves evaporating and condensing lithium surfaces near or at the divertor plate, creating a density gradient of lithium vapor.
- This gradient helps control energy losses by linking them to the poloidal distance between the target and detachment point.
- Preventing the radiation zone from reaching the X-point decreases the ionization rate of lithium as the detachment front moves away from the divertor target.
- Scrape Off Layer Plasma Simulator (SOLPS) simulations are conducted to investigate a lithium vapor box divertor using an NSTX-U equilibrium and PFC geometry.
- The simulations show acceptable agreement with experimental Scrape-Off Layer (SOL) widths, indicating a reasonable choice of transport coefficients.
- Predictive simulations suggest that with specific evaporation rates, it is possible to reduce the target electron temperature to recombination levels, indicating successful detachment.
- Peak heat flux at the lower outer target can be reduced by up to a factor of six while maintaining upstream lithium fractions below 2%.
- Frictional forces from a deuterium gas puff prevent lithium from reaching the midplane.
- Lithium is redeposited close to the evaporator, which is advantageous for initial tests and future capillary porous systems.
- The study provides insights into the effectiveness of a lithium vapor box divertor in detaching plasma in fusion devices.
- The findings suggest that this technique has potential to significantly reduce heat flux and impurity concentration, making it a promising approach for improving plasma performance in fusion reactors.
Authors: E. D. Emdee, R. J. Goldston, J. D Lore, X. Zhang
Abstract: The lithium vapor box divertor aims to detach the divertor plasma via evaporating and condensing lithium surfaces. By evaporating lithium near or at the divertor plate and condensing it closer to the main chamber, a lithium vapor density gradient can be created. This density gradient ties energy losses to poloidal distance between the target and the detachment point. The radiation zone is then prevented from reaching the X-point as the lithium ionization rate decreases when the detachment front moves away from the divertor target. Here we present Scrape Off Layer Plasma Simulator (SOLPS) simulations of a lithium vapor box divertor using an NSTX-U equilibrium and PFC geometry. The parameters for the core boundary conditions, gas puff intensity, and heat and particle transport coefficients are chosen to match experimental values. Acceptable agreement with experimental Scrape-Off Layer (SOL) widths is found, indicating a reasonable choice of transport coefficients. In predictive simulations, lithium is added via evaporation at the target. Predictions for peak heat fluxes and upstream impurity concentration are given for a variety of evaporation rates. Target electron temperature is predicted to be able to be reduced to recombination levels (below 1 eV) for lithium evaporation rates of $1\cdot10^{23}$ Li/s, indicating detachment. Peak heat flux at the lower outer target could be reduced by as much as a factor of six while maintaining upstream lithium fractions below 2%. The prevention of lithium from reaching the midplane is shown to be due to an increase in frictional forces acting on the lithium from a deuterium gas puff. Lithium is also shown to be redeposited close to the evaporator which is favorable for initial tests and future capillary porous systems.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.