This article presents the development and evaluation of a human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system (HCPS) called CAN Coach, which aims to improve the longitudinal control of individual vehicles in traffic flow. The system provides feedback to the human driver using radar data available on the controller area network (CAN), specifically relative speed and position information to objects ahead. The study involves six human subjects driving an instrumented vehicle, comparing their ability to achieve a constant time-gap control policy using only visual perception versus augmenting perception with audible feedback from CAN sensor data. Results show that adding CAN-based feedback reduces mean time-gap error by 73% and improves consistency by reducing standard deviation of time-gap error by 53%. The study also includes a ghost mode where visual perception is removed, and drivers are coached to track a virtual vehicle on the road instead of a physical one. This mode degrades performance for most drivers but shows that they can match velocity with or without CAN-based feedback, although velocity matching does not regulate vehicle spacing. The authors demonstrate the viability of dynamic time-gap control. Related works informing the formation of CAN Coach include research on controlling traffic waves via Lagrangian control, vehicular-based variable speed limits, modeling and simulation for designing human-in-the-loop vehicle control systems, driver assistance systems for promoting eco-driving at signalized intersections, and field experiments demonstrating human traffic flow stabilization using automated vehicles. The use of CAN data as a source for analyzing driving behavior is becoming increasingly recognized in research. For instance, previous studies have used it to analyze lane changing, turning, driver categorization and identify aggressive maneuvers in real time. However, unlike CAN Coach introduced here these analyses are not used to close the loop on the human driver in real time. Overall this study demonstrates that coaching drivers with CAN data can improve their performance on driving tasks while highlighting that removing human perception from the control loop reduces performance at given objectives. Therefore CAN Coach is a true HCPS that aims to enhance human driving abilities rather than replace them with the human driver playing a monitoring role while the system carries out control objectives. The authors plan to extend their work in future studies.
The article talks about a system called CAN Coach that helps drivers control their cars better by giving them feedback using radar data. The study involved six people driving a car with and without the feedback from CAN Coach. The results showed that the feedback helped drivers reduce errors and be more consistent in controlling their car's distance from other cars on the road. There was also a mode where drivers had to follow a virtual car instead of a real one, which was harder for most people. The authors of the study looked at other research related to improving traffic flow and driver assistance systems. Overall, CAN Coach is meant to help drivers improve their skills rather than replace them with automated systems.
Definitions
- Human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system (HCPS): A system that combines human decision-making with computer-controlled physical processes.
- Longitudinal control: Controlling the speed or distance between vehicles traveling in the same direction.
- Radar data: Information gathered by using radar technology to detect objects and measure their distance and speed.
- Constant time-gap control policy: A strategy for maintaining a consistent distance between vehicles while driving.
- Standard deviation: A measure of how spread out values are from the average value.
Improving Human Driving Performance with CAN Coach
In recent years, the use of cyber-physical systems (CPS) has become increasingly popular in the automotive industry. These systems are designed to assist drivers in various tasks, from navigation and route planning to automated driving. However, most CPSs rely on artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that can be difficult for humans to understand and interact with. To address this issue, researchers have developed a human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system (HCPS) called CAN Coach which aims to improve the longitudinal control of individual vehicles in traffic flow by providing feedback to human drivers using radar data available on the controller area network (CAN).
Background
The development of CAN Coach builds upon previous research into controlling traffic waves via Lagrangian control, vehicular-based variable speed limits, modeling and simulation for designing human-in-the loop vehicle control systems, driver assistance systems for promoting eco-driving at signalized intersections, and field experiments demonstrating human traffic flow stabilization using automated vehicles. Additionally, prior studies have used CAN data to analyze lane changing, turning behavior and identify aggressive maneuvers in real time; however these analyses were not used to close the loop on the human driver in real time as is done with CAN Coach.
Methodology
To evaluate the effectiveness of CAN Coach six subjects drove an instrumented vehicle while their performance was compared between two conditions: visual perception only versus augmenting perception with audible feedback from CAN sensor data. The audible feedback provided relative speed and position information about objects ahead which enabled drivers to maintain a desired time gap between them and other cars on the road. In addition a ghost mode was also tested where visual perception was removed completely so that drivers had no physical reference point but instead tracked a virtual vehicle on the road instead of a physical one.
Results
Results showed that adding CAN based feedback reduced mean time gap error by 73% and improved consistency by reducing standard deviation of time gap error by 53%. Ghost mode degraded performance for most drivers but still showed they could match velocity with or without CAN based feedback although velocity matching does not regulate vehicle spacing as effectively as maintaining a constant time gap does.
Conclusion
Overall this study demonstrates that coaching drivers with CAN data can improve their performance on driving tasks while highlighting that removing human perception from the control loop reduces performance at given objectives. Therefore CAN Coach is an effective HCPS that enhances rather than replaces human driving abilities while allowing humans to play a monitoring role while it carries out its objectives autonomously. The authors plan to extend their work further in future studies exploring different applications for HCPSs such as those related to safety or efficiency improvements when navigating complex environments like cities or highways..
This work addresses whether a human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system (HCPS) can be effective in improving the longitudinal control of an individual vehicle in a traffic flow. We introduce the CAN Coach, which is a system that gives feedback to the human-in-the-loop using radar data (relative speed and position information to objects ahead) that is available on the controller area network (CAN). Using a cohort of six human subjects driving an instrumented vehicle, we compare the ability of the human-in-the-loop driver to achieve a constant time-gap control policy using only human-based visual perception to the car ahead, and by augmenting human perception with audible feedback from CAN sensor data. The addition of CAN-based feedback reduces the mean time-gap error by an average of 73%, and also improves the consistency of the human by reducing the standard deviation of the time-gap error by 53%. We remove human perception from the loop using a ghost mode in which the human-in-the-loop is coached to track a virtual vehicle on the road, rather than a physical one. The loss of visual perception of the vehicle ahead degrades the performance for most drivers, but by varying amounts. We show that human subjects can match the velocity of the lead vehicle ahead with and without CAN-based feedback, but velocity matching does not offer regulation of vehicle spacing. The viability of dynamic time-gap control is also demonstrated. We conclude that (1) it is possible to coach drivers to improve performance on driving tasks using CAN data, and (2) it is a true HCPS, since removing human perception from the control loop reduces performance at the given control objective.
