Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.02357v1

In this paper, we explore the potential of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods for decision-support in medical image analysis scenarios. Specifically, we focus on improving the comprehensibility of decisions made by a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) by providing visual explanations. We apply three types of explainable methods - LIME, SHAP, and CIU - to a dataset of in-vivo gastral images obtained from Video capsule endoscopy (VCE). The goal is to increase trust among health professionals in the predictions made by the CNN. To evaluate the effectiveness of these explainable methods, we conducted three user studies using human evaluation. Participants from non-medical backgrounds were asked to provide feedback on their experience and understanding of the explanations provided by LIME, SHAP, and CIU. Each user group consisted of 20 participants. Our findings suggest that the CIU method outperformed both LIME and SHAP in terms of increasing support for human decision-making and being more transparent and understandable to users. Additionally, CIU generated explanations more rapidly than the other two methods. These results indicate that there are notable differences in human decision-making depending on the type of explanation support provided. Future evaluations should involve domain experts and focus on application-grounded assessments specific to the use of explanations. Moreover, expanding scope by testing these explanations on more complex medical cases as well as applying them in real-life settings would enhance their applicability. Increasing sample size would also provide more statistically meaningful outcomes. Moving forward, we plan to generalize these explainable methods on different medical datasets with future improvements in implementation; this would provide decision-support for medical experts in a wide range of scenarios. In conclusion, our research offers valuable insights into the details of explanation support and its potential implementation in machine learning. The CIU method shows promise as a highly effective explainable method, providing decision-support and improving performance.

• - Exploring the potential of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods for decision-support in medical image analysis scenarios
• - Focusing on improving the comprehensibility of decisions made by a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) through visual explanations
• - Applying three types of explainable methods - LIME, SHAP, and CIU - to a dataset of in-vivo gastral images obtained from Video capsule endoscopy (VCE)
• - Goal: Increase trust among health professionals in CNN predictions
• - Conducted three user studies using human evaluation with participants from non-medical backgrounds
• - Findings suggest that the CIU method outperformed LIME and SHAP in terms of increasing support for human decision-making, transparency, and understandability
• - CIU generated explanations more rapidly than the other two methods
• - Future evaluations should involve domain experts and focus on application-grounded assessments specific to the use of explanations
• - Expanding scope by testing explanations on more complex medical cases and applying them in real-life settings would enhance applicability
• - Increasing sample size would provide more statistically meaningful outcomes
• - Plan to generalize these explainable methods on different medical datasets with future improvements in implementation for decision-support in various scenarios

SummaryScientists are studying ways to make artificial intelligence in medicine easier to understand. They want to help doctors trust the decisions made by computers. They tested three methods that explain how the computer makes decisions using pictures of stomachs. One method called CIU was the best at helping people understand and make decisions. In the future, they want to test these methods on more difficult cases and use them in real-life situations. Definitions- Explaining Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Methods that help people understand how computers make decisions. - Decision-support: Helping someone make a decision. - Comprehensibility: How easy something is to understand. - Convolutional Neural Network (CNN): A type of computer program that can analyze images. - Dataset: A collection of information or data. - In-vivo gastral images: Pictures taken inside a person's stomach using a special camera. - Video capsule endoscopy (VCE): A procedure where a small camera is swallowed to take pictures of the digestive system. - Trust: Believing that something or someone is reliable or honest. - User studies: Experiments involving people using a product or system. - Transparency: Being able to see and understand how something works. - Understandability: How easy something is to understand. - Rapidly: Happening quickly or fast.

Exploring the Potential of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Decision-Support in Medical Image Analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an increasingly important tool in medical image analysis. AI algorithms are able to detect patterns and make predictions that humans may not be able to recognize. However, these algorithms can be difficult to interpret and explain, making it hard for health professionals to trust their decisions. This is where Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) comes into play. XAI methods aim to provide explanations that help users understand why a particular decision was made by an AI algorithm. In this paper, we explore the potential of XAI methods for decision-support in medical image analysis scenarios. Specifically, we focus on improving the comprehensibility of decisions made by a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) by providing visual explanations. We apply three types of explainable methods - LIME, SHAP, and CIU - to a dataset of in-vivo gastral images obtained from Video capsule endoscopy (VCE). The goal is to increase trust among health professionals in the predictions made by the CNN.

User Studies

To evaluate the effectiveness of these explainable methods, we conducted three user studies using human evaluation. Participants from non-medical backgrounds were asked to provide feedback on their experience and understanding of the explanations provided by LIME, SHAP, and CIU. Each user group consisted of 20 participants. Our findings suggest that the CIU method outperformed both LIME and SHAP in terms of increasing support for human decision-making and being more transparent and understandable to users. Additionally, CIU generated explanations more rapidly than the other two methods. These results indicate that there are notable differences in human decision-making depending on the type of explanation support provided.

Future Evaluations

Future evaluations should involve domain experts and focus on application-grounded assessments specific to the use of explanations. Moreover, expanding scope by testing these explanations on more complex medical cases as well as applying them in real-life settings would enhance their applicability