Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.02949v1

In academia, faculty hiring networks play a crucial role in shaping social and epistemic inequalities. These networks often exhibit steep hierarchies, which can perpetuate existing disparities and hinder efforts to diversify the academic landscape. Understanding the mechanisms that drive these patterns is essential for promoting inclusivity and shedding light on how scientific discoveries are made. To investigate the factors contributing to hierarchy and other network characteristics in faculty hiring, a study was conducted using adaptive rewiring network models. These models aim to replicate the observed structures of real hiring networks by reinforcing institutional prestige in five distinct ways. Each mechanism determines the probability of a new hire coming from a specific institution based on that institution's prestige score, which is inferred from the existing structure of the hiring network. The findings reveal that structural inequalities and centrality patterns in actual hiring networks are best explained by a mechanism called global placement power. This mechanism dictates that new hires are drawn from particular institutions in proportion to the number of previous hires from anywhere within those institutions. On the other hand, biased visibility within the network is better captured by a mechanism known as local placement power. Under this mechanism, new hires are selected from an institution based on the number of its previous hires already present at the hiring institution. These contrasting results suggest that hierarchical structures in faculty hiring networks arise from a combination of global and local preferences for institutional prestige. It is shown that each institution's position within the hierarchy remains remarkably stable due to dynamic competition favoring more prestigious institutions. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how structural mechanisms contribute to hierarchies in faculty hiring networks and how these dynamics influence scientific discovery and knowledge production. By understanding these dynamics, efforts can be made to address inequalities and promote diversity within academia.

• - Faculty hiring networks shape social and epistemic inequalities in academia
• - Steep hierarchies in these networks perpetuate existing disparities and hinder diversification efforts
• - Understanding the mechanisms driving these patterns is crucial for promoting inclusivity and understanding scientific discoveries
• - A study used adaptive rewiring network models to investigate factors contributing to hierarchy and other network characteristics in faculty hiring
• - Five distinct mechanisms were used to replicate observed structures, based on institutional prestige scores
• - Global placement power mechanism explains structural inequalities and centrality patterns in actual hiring networks
• - Local placement power mechanism captures biased visibility within the network
• - Hierarchical structures arise from a combination of global and local preferences for institutional prestige
• - Institutions' positions within the hierarchy remain stable due to dynamic competition favoring more prestigious institutions
• - This research provides insights into how structural mechanisms contribute to hierarchies in faculty hiring networks and influence scientific discovery and knowledge production

Faculty hiring networks are groups of people who make decisions about who gets hired in universities. These networks can create unfairness and inequality in academia. The way these networks are organized can make it hard for different kinds of people to get hired. It is important to understand why this happens so that everyone has a fair chance and we can learn new things. A study used computer models to figure out why some universities have more power than others in these networks. They found that the reputation of a university is one reason why some universities have more power. This research helps us understand how these networks work and how they affect what we learn." Definitions- Faculty: The teachers and professors at a university. - Hiring: Choosing someone for a job. - Networks: Groups of people who work together or know each other. - Inequalities: Unfair differences between people or groups. - Academia: The world of colleges, universities, and learning.

Exploring the Dynamics of Faculty Hiring Networks

In academia, faculty hiring networks play a crucial role in shaping social and epistemic inequalities. These networks often exhibit steep hierarchies, which can perpetuate existing disparities and hinder efforts to diversify the academic landscape. Understanding the mechanisms that drive these patterns is essential for promoting inclusivity and shedding light on how scientific discoveries are made. To investigate the factors contributing to hierarchy and other network characteristics in faculty hiring, a study was conducted using adaptive rewiring network models.

Adaptive Rewiring Network Models

Adaptive rewiring network models aim to replicate the observed structures of real hiring networks by reinforcing institutional prestige in five distinct ways. Each mechanism determines the probability of a new hire coming from a specific institution based on that institution's prestige score, which is inferred from the existing structure of the hiring network. The five mechanisms are: global placement power, local placement power, biased visibility within institutions, biased visibility between institutions, and preferential attachment.

Global Placement Power vs Local Placement Power

The findings reveal that structural inequalities and centrality patterns in actual hiring networks are best explained by a mechanism called global placement power. This mechanism dictates that new hires are drawn from particular institutions in proportion to the number of previous hires from anywhere within those institutions. On the other hand, biased visibility within the network is better captured by a mechanism known as local placement power. Under this mechanism, new hires are selected from an institution based on the number of its previous hires already present at the hiring institution.

Stability Within Hierarchical Structures

These contrasting results suggest that hierarchical structures in faculty hiring networks arise from a combination of global and local preferences for institutional prestige. It is shown that each institution's position within the hierarchy remains remarkably stable due to dynamic competition favoring more prestigious institutions.

Conclusion

Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how structural mechanisms contribute to hierarchies in faculty hiring networks and how these dynamics influence scientific discovery and knowledge production. By understanding these dynamics, efforts can be made to address inequalities and promote diversity within academia