Priors in Bayesian Deep Learning: A Review

Authors: Vincent Fortuin

AI-generated keywords: Bayesian Deep Learning Prior Choices Gaussian Processes Variational Autoencoders Bayesian Neural Networks

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper emphasizes the significance of prior choices in Bayesian deep learning models
  • Recent models have often used vague priors like standard Gaussians
  • The review provides an overview of different priors proposed for (deep) Gaussian processes, variational autoencoders, and Bayesian neural networks
  • Various methods for learning priors from data are discussed in detail
  • The review aims to inspire practitioners to think more carefully about their model's prior choices
  • The paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking guidance on selecting appropriate priors for their Bayesian deep learning models
  • Prior choices play a crucial role in Bayesian deep learning and practitioners should consider more informed and tailored prior specifications
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: While the choice of prior is one of the most critical parts of the Bayesian inference workflow, recent Bayesian deep learning models have often fallen back on vague priors, such as standard Gaussians. In this review, we highlight the importance of prior choices for Bayesian deep learning and present an overview of different priors that have been proposed for (deep) Gaussian processes, variational autoencoders, and Bayesian neural networks. We also outline different methods of learning priors for these models from data. We hope to motivate practitioners in Bayesian deep learning to think more carefully about the prior specification for their models and to provide them with some inspiration in this regard.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 May. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.06868v3

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Priors in Bayesian Deep Learning: A Review" by Vincent Fortuin emphasizes the significance of prior choices in Bayesian deep learning models. While the choice of prior is a critical aspect of the Bayesian inference workflow, recent models have often resorted to vague priors like standard Gaussians. This review aims to highlight the importance of thoughtful prior specification and provides an overview of different priors proposed for (deep) Gaussian processes, variational autoencoders, and Bayesian neural networks. The authors discuss various methods for learning priors from data and present them in detail. By exploring different approaches to prior specification, this review intends to inspire practitioners in Bayesian deep learning to think more carefully about their model's prior choices. The paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking guidance on selecting appropriate priors for their Bayesian deep learning models. Overall, this comprehensive review sheds light on the crucial role that prior choices play in Bayesian deep learning and encourages practitioners to consider more informed and tailored prior specifications for their models.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.