Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.08553v1

The study examines the plausibility of in situ formation of multiple-planet systems that include a hot Jupiter and smaller planetary companions. The existence of such systems has been confirmed through observations, with examples like WASP-47, Kepler-730, and TOI-1130. The researchers employ $N$-body simulations that incorporate realistic treatments of collisions, an evolving protoplanetary disc, and eccentricity/inclination damping of planetary embryos. Two different models are used for the core of the giant planet: a 'seed-model' and an 'equal-mass-model'. In the seed-model, a more massive protoplanet is placed among multiple small embryos in a compact configuration. On the other hand, the equal-mass model consists only of equal-mass embryos. Simulations based on the seed-model reveal that systems containing a hot Jupiter and super-Earths can be formed. The evolution follows four distinct phases: early giant impacts; runaway gas accretion onto the seed protoplanet; disc damping-dominated evolution of the embryos orbiting exterior to the giant planet; and a late chaotic phase after dispersal of the gas disc. Approximately 1% of simulations using the equal-mass model result in the formation of a giant planet following the same four-phase evolution. Synthetic transit observations from these simulations indicate an occurrence rate of 0.26% for systems with both a hot Jupiter and an inner super Earth. This occurrence rate is similar to that derived from actual transit surveys (0.2%), but simulated hot Jupiters are rarely detected as single transiting planets which disagrees with observations. Additionally some simulations produce two close in giants resembling WASP 148 system. Overall this study demonstrates that this particular scenario provides a viable pathway for forming systems with unusual architectures but does not apply to most hot Jupiters.

• The study examines the plausibility of in situ formation of multiple-planet systems that include a hot Jupiter and smaller planetary companions.
• Examples of such systems, like WASP-47, Kepler-730, and TOI-1130, have been confirmed through observations.
• $N$-body simulations are used to incorporate realistic treatments of collisions, an evolving protoplanetary disc, and eccentricity/inclination damping of planetary embryos.
• Two different models are used for the core of the giant planet: a 'seed-model' and an 'equal-mass-model'.
• Simulations based on the seed-model reveal that systems containing a hot Jupiter and super-Earths can be formed through four distinct phases: early giant impacts; runaway gas accretion onto the seed protoplanet; disc damping-dominated evolution of the embryos orbiting exterior to the giant planet; and a late chaotic phase after dispersal of the gas disc.
• Approximately 1% of simulations using the equal-mass model result in the formation of a giant planet following the same four-phase evolution.
• Synthetic transit observations from these simulations indicate an occurrence rate of 0.26% for systems with both a hot Jupiter and an inner super Earth.
• Simulated hot Jupiters are rarely detected as single transiting planets, which disagrees with observations.
• Some simulations produce two close-in giants resembling WASP 148 system.
• Overall, this study demonstrates that this particular scenario provides a viable pathway for forming systems with unusual architectures but does not apply to most hot Jupiters.

Summary This study looks at how planets are formed in space. They found some examples of systems with a big planet called a hot Jupiter and smaller planets around it. They used computer simulations to understand how these planets form. They tested two different models for the big planet's core. The simulations showed that sometimes systems with a hot Jupiter and smaller planets can be formed, but it doesn't happen very often. Definitions- Plausibility: the possibility that something could be true or real - In situ formation: the process of forming something in its original place - Observations: watching and studying something carefully - Simulations: using computers to create models or scenarios to understand how things work - Protoplanetary disc: a rotating disk of gas and dust around a young star where planets form - Eccentricity/inclination damping: reducing the differences in shape or angle of an orbit over time - Embryos: early stages of development for something, like planets forming in space - Giant impacts: when two big objects collide with each other - Accretion: the process of particles coming together to form bigger objects - Dispersal: spreading out or scattering something

In Situ Formation of Hot Jupiters and Smaller Planetary Companions

Recent observations have confirmed the existence of multiple-planet systems that include a hot Jupiter and smaller planetary companions, such as WASP-47, Kepler-730, and TOI-1130. In order to better understand how these systems form, researchers conducted $N$-body simulations which incorporated realistic treatments of collisions, an evolving protoplanetary disc, and eccentricity/inclination damping of planetary embryos. Two different models were used for the core of the giant planet: a 'seed-model' and an 'equal-mass model'.

The Seed Model

The seed model consists of a more massive protoplanet placed among multiple small embryos in a compact configuration. Simulations based on this model revealed that systems containing both a hot Jupiter and super Earths can be formed through four distinct phases: early giant impacts; runaway gas accretion onto the seed protoplanet; disc damping dominated evolution of the embryos orbiting exterior to the giant planet; and finally a late chaotic phase after dispersal of the gas disc.

The Equal Mass Model

The equal mass model consists only of equal mass embryos. Approximately 1% of simulations using this model resulted in formation of a giant planet following similar four phase evolution as seen with the seed model. Synthetic transit observations from these simulations indicate an occurrence rate for systems with both hot Jupiters and inner super Earths at 0.26%. This is similar to what has been derived from actual transit surveys (0.2%). However simulated hot Jupiters are rarely detected as single transiting planets which does not match up with observations. Additionally some simulations produced two close in giants resembling WASP 148 system.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that this particular scenario provides viable pathways for forming unusual architectures but does not apply to most hot Jupiters observed today.