Circumbinary planets: migration, trapping in mean-motion resonances, and ejection
AI-generated Key Points
- Most planetary systems around binary stars are located at approximately three semi-major axes from the barycentre of their system, which is close to low-order mean-motion resonances (MMRs).
- The formation mechanism of these circumbinary planets is not yet fully understood.
- In situ formation is challenging due to the strong interaction with the binary.
- Interactions between these planets and the surrounding protoplanetary disc cause them to migrate at velocities dependent on the nature of the disc and mass of exoplanet.
- Researchers used direct n-body simulations approach to model a large variety of parameters at much lower cost than hydrodynamical simulations.
- Using an ensemble learning method for classification, they identified capture probability for different N/1 MMRs, where 4/1 was found to be most prone to capturing exoplanets with a 37% probability followed by MMR 5/1 with $\sim$23% probability.
- The eccentricity of the binary was found to be the most important parameter in determining MMR capture followed by mass ratio and initial eccentricity of planet.
- Higher binary eccentricity led to higher value predominant capture MMRs.
- Rint = 4 was mainly obtained for simulations with eB = {0.01, 0.03, 0.05}, while each remaining Rint had only one principal binary eccentricity associated with it.
- The study provides insights into how planets migrate within circumbinary discs and can help us understand where and for how long circumbinary planets can survive around stellar binaries.
- Researchers suggest assuming recipes for planetary accretion and disc dissipation timescale in future models as this could be important in determining outcomes in runaway regimes for large planets (>20M⊕).
Authors: Emmanuel Gianuzzi, Cristian A. Giuppone, Nicolás Cuello
Abstract: Most of the planetary systems discovered around binary stars are located at approximately three semi-major axes from the barycentre of their system, curiously close to low-order mean-motion resonances (MMRs). The formation mechanism of these circumbinary planets is not yet fully understood. In situ formation is extremely challenging because of the strong interaction with the binary. One possible explanation is that, after their formation, the interactions between these planets and the surrounding protoplanetary disc cause them to migrate at velocities dependent on the nature of the disc and the mass of the exoplanet. Although extensive data can be obtained with direct hydrodynamical simulations, their computational cost remains too high. On the other hand, the direct n-body simulations approach allows us to model a large variety of parameters at much lower cost. We analyse the planetary migration around a wide variety of binary stars using Stokes-like forces that mimic planetary migration at a constant rate. Our goal is to identify the main parameters responsible for the ejection of planets at different resonances with the inner binary. We performed 4200 n-body simulations with Stokes-like forces and analysed their evolution and outcome as a function of the properties of each system. For each simulated exoplanet, we applied an ensemble learning method for classification in order to clarify the relationship between the inspected parameters and the process of MMR capture. We identify the capture probability for different N/1 MMRs, 4/1 being the most prone to capture exoplanets, with 37% probability, followed by MMR 5/1 with $\sim$ 23% of probability. The eccentricity of the binary is found to be the most important parameter in determining the MMR capture of each circumbinary exoplanet, followed by the mass ratio of the binary and the initial eccentricity of the planet.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.