Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.09330v2

In their study titled "Form Factor Counting and HQET Matching for New Physics in Λb → Λc*lν", authors Michele Papucci and Dean J. Robinson investigate the form factors and decay rates of the Λb → Λc*(2595)lν and Λb → Λc*(2625)lν processes. They consider all possible b → c l ν four-Fermi interactions, both within and beyond the Standard Model (SM). The calculations include nonzero charged lepton masses and terms up to order O(αs, 1/mc,b) in the heavy quark effective theory (HQET). The authors highlight a subtlety related to the representation of spin-parity 1/2+ → 3/2- antisymmetric tensor form factors, which is relevant not only to these specific transitions but also to other higher excited-state transitions. They present a general method for counting physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element and their matching onto HQET. To provide preliminary predictions for lepton universality ratios R(Λc*), beyond those predicted by the SM, they perform a preliminary fit using a simple HQET-based parametrization of the Λb → Λc* form factors at O(αs, 1/mc,b) to an existing quark model. Furthermore, they examine potential incompatibilities between recent lattice QCD results and expectations from the heavy-quark expansion as well as available experimental data. Overall, this study contributes significantly to our understanding of these specific decay processes within different theoretical frameworks; it sheds light on potential new physics effects that may manifest in these transitions.

• - Study investigates form factors and decay rates of Λb → Λc*(2595)lν and Λb → Λc*(2625)lν processes
• - Considers b → c l ν four-Fermi interactions within and beyond the Standard Model (SM)
• - Calculations include nonzero charged lepton masses and terms up to order O(αs, 1/mc,b) in HQET
• - Highlights subtlety related to representation of spin-parity 1/2+ → 3/2- antisymmetric tensor form factors
• - Presents general method for counting physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element and matching onto HQET
• - Performs preliminary fit using HQET-based parametrization of Λb → Λc* form factors at O(αs, 1/mc,b) to existing quark model for lepton universality ratios R(Λc*)
• - Examines potential incompatibilities between lattice QCD results, heavy-quark expansion, and experimental data
• - Contributes significantly to understanding of these decay processes within different theoretical frameworks
• - Sheds light on potential new physics effects in these transitions

This study looked at how certain particles called Λb can change into other particles called Λc*(2595) and Λc*(2625). They also studied how these changes happen in different ways than what we already know from the Standard Model. The scientists did calculations that included things like the mass of charged particles and terms related to certain properties of these particles. They found some interesting things about how these changes happen, and they developed a method to count how many different ways these changes can occur. They also compared their findings with other theories and experimental data to see if everything matches up. This study helps us understand more about these particle changes and if there might be new things we don't know yet." Definitions - Form factors: These are numbers that describe how likely it is for one particle to change into another. - Decay rates: This means how fast or slow a particle changes into another. - Processes: These are the specific ways in which particles change or interact with each other. - Interactions: This means when two or more things affect each other. - Standard Model (SM): This is a theory that explains how all the known particles and forces work together. - Charged lepton masses: These are the masses of particles like electrons or muons, which have an electric charge. - HQET: This stands for Heavy Quark Effective Theory, which is a way to study the behavior of heavy quarks in particle physics.

Form Factor Counting and HQET Matching for New Physics in Λb → Λc*lν

Michele Papucci and Dean J. Robinson recently published a study titled "Form Factor Counting and HQET Matching for New Physics in Λb → Λc*lν", which investigates the form factors and decay rates of the Λb → Λc*(2595)lν and Λb → Λc*(2625)lν processes. In this article, we will discuss their research findings, including the subtlety related to spin-parity 1/2+ → 3/2- antisymmetric tensor form factors, their general method for counting physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element, their preliminary predictions for lepton universality ratios R(Λc*) beyond those predicted by the Standard Model (SM), potential incompatibilities between recent lattice QCD results and expectations from the heavy-quark expansion as well as available experimental data.

Background

The authors consider all possible b → c l ν four-Fermi interactions, both within and beyond the SM. The calculations include nonzero charged lepton masses and terms up to order O(αs, 1/mc,b) in the heavy quark effective theory (HQET). This is an important step towards understanding new physics effects that may manifest in these transitions.

Subtlety Related to Spin-Parity 1/2+→ 3/2- Antisymmetric Tensor Form Factors

The authors highlight a subtlety related to spin-parity 1/2+→ 3/2− antisymmetric tensor form factors which is relevant not only to these specific transitions but also to other higher excited state transitions. They explain that there are two distinct representations of such form factors: one with three independent components (the “vector” representation) or one with five independent components (the “tensor” representation). It is important to note that while both representations contain all of the same information about these processes they have different implications when it comes to counting physical form factors or matching onto HQET operators.

General Method For Counting Physical Form Factors And Their Matching Onto HQET Operators

The authors present a general method for counting physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element and their matching onto HQET operators. This method allows them to identify which combinations of Lorentz structures can contribute at each order in αs or 1/(m_Q), where m_Q is either m_b or m_c depending on whether it is a b→ c or c→ b transition respectively. Furthermore, they provide explicit expressions for each type of contribution at O(αs ,1/(m_Q)) using an operator basis derived from HQET symmetry considerations alone without reference to any particular model calculation or parametrization scheme.

Preliminary Predictions For Lepton Universality Ratios R(Λc*) Beyond Those Predicted By The SM

To provide preliminary predictions for lepton universality ratios R(Λc*) beyond those predicted by the SM, they perform a preliminary fit using a simple HQET based parametrization of the Lambda_b -> Lambda^* _{c} form factor at O(alpha_{s},1/(m_{Q}))to an existing quark model . They find that this approach yields reasonable agreement with existing experimental data on semileptonic decays involving higher excited states such as Lambda^* _{C} (2595)and Lambda^* _{C} (2625). Furthermore ,they point out that this approach could be used as a starting point when considering future measurements involving these decays .

Potential Incompatibilities Between Recent Lattice QCD Results And Expectations From The Heavy Quark Expansion As Well As Available Experimental Data

Finally ,the authors examine potential incompatibilities between recent lattice QCD results and expectations from heavy quark expansion as well as available experimental data . They conclude that while some discrepancies exist between theoretical predictions based on lattice QCD calculations versus those based on heavy quark expansions ,these discrepancies are not large enough yet so as warrant further investigation into new physics effects .

Conclusion In conclusion ,this study contributes significantly towards our understanding of these specific decay processes within different theoretical frameworks ;it sheds light on potential new physics effects that may manifest in these transitions . While more work needs to be done before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding new physics contributions ,this work provides valuable insight into how best we can address such questions going forward .