Design and execution of quantum circuits using tens of superconducting qubits and thousands of gates for dense Ising optimization problems

AI-generated keywords: Hardware-efficient ansatz Variational optimization Quantum circuits Ising optimization Superconducting qubits

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors propose a hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization in quantum circuits
  • Ansatz derived from existing ones in the literature and parametrizes subsets of all interactions in the Cost Hamiltonian in each layer
  • Treating gate orderings as a variational parameter improves performance in experiments
  • Experimental runs conducted using compilation-optimized implementation of fully-connected Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonians on a 50-qubit linear-chain subsystem of the Rigetti Aspen-M-3 transmon processor
  • Average performance at optimized angles and gate orderings increased with circuit depth for best circuit designs tested
  • Approach achieved significantly better performance than using random guess oracle for circuits involving up to approximately 5000 two-qubit and 5000 one-qubit native gates
  • Hardware-efficient ansatz effectively tackles dense Ising optimization problems
  • Findings contribute to more effective utilization of current and future quantum processors for optimization purposes
  • Potential applications in solving dense Ising optimization problems using tens of superconducting qubits and thousands of gates
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Filip B. Maciejewski, Stuart Hadfield, Benjamin Hall, Mark Hodson, Maxime Dupont, Bram Evert, James Sud, M. Sohaib Alam, Zhihui Wang, Stephen Jeffrey, Bhuvanesh Sundar, P. Aaron Lott, Shon Grabbe, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Matthew J. Reagor, Davide Venturelli

arXiv: 2308.12423v1 - DOI (quant-ph)

Abstract: We develop a hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization, derived from existing ansatze in the literature, that parametrizes subsets of all interactions in the Cost Hamiltonian in each layer. We treat gate orderings as a variational parameter and observe that doing so can provide significant performance boosts in experiments. We carried out experimental runs of a compilation-optimized implementation of fully-connected Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonians on a 50-qubit linear-chain subsystem of Rigetti Aspen-M-3 transmon processor. Our results indicate that, for the best circuit designs tested, the average performance at optimized angles and gate orderings increases with circuit depth (using more parameters), despite the presence of a high level of noise. We report performance significantly better than using a random guess oracle for circuits involving up to approx 5000 two-qubit and approx 5000 one-qubit native gates. We additionally discuss various takeaways of our results toward more effective utilization of current and future quantum processors for optimization.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.12423v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The authors of this study propose a hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization in quantum circuits. They derive their ansatz from existing ones in the literature and parametrize subsets of all interactions in the Cost Hamiltonian in each layer. Additionally, they treat gate orderings as a variational parameter and find that doing so can significantly improve performance in experiments. To test their approach, the researchers conducted experimental runs using a compilation-optimized implementation of fully-connected Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonians on a 50-qubit linear-chain subsystem of the Rigetti Aspen-M-3 transmon processor. Despite the presence of high levels of noise, they observed that the average performance at optimized angles and gate orderings increased with circuit depth (using more parameters) for the best circuit designs tested. Remarkably, the results showed that their approach achieved performance significantly better than using a random guess oracle for circuits involving up to approximately 5000 two-qubit and 5000 one-qubit native gates. This indicates that their hardware-efficient ansatz can effectively tackle dense Ising optimization problems. In addition to presenting their findings, the authors discuss various takeaways from their results that contribute to more effective utilization of current and future quantum processors for optimization purposes. Overall, this study introduces a novel hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization in quantum circuits and demonstrates its effectiveness through experimental runs on a real quantum processor. The promising results suggest potential applications in solving dense Ising optimization problems using tens of superconducting qubits and thousands of gates.
Created on 20 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.