Markov Neural Operators for Learning Chaotic Systems

AI-generated keywords: Chaos Theory

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Chaotic systems are difficult to predict due to their inherent instability and accumulation of small errors.
  • Trajectories of chaotic systems can reside within a low-dimensional subspace called an attractor.
  • Markovian chaotic systems can have their attractor uniquely determined by the Markov operator.
  • Learning the Markov operator enables forecasting the overall behavior of chaotic systems.
  • Neural operators, specifically Markov neural operators (MNO), can be used for learning chaotic systems.
  • MNOs are trained using local one-step evolution information and can derive the global attractor and invariant measure of the system.
  • The Markov neural operator formed a discrete semigroup that remained stable during empirical experiments.
  • Neural operators are more accurate and stable compared to previous methods for predicting chaotic systems like Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and Navier-Stokes equations.
  • This breakthrough has applications in various fields including physics, biology, and climate science.
  • Learning the Markov operator through neural operators provides valuable insights into chaotic systems and allows predictions even without precise trajectory information.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zongyi Li, Nikola Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew Stuart, Anima Anandkumar

Abstract: Chaotic systems are notoriously challenging to predict because of their instability. Small errors accumulate in the simulation of each time step, resulting in completely different trajectories. However, the trajectories of many prominent chaotic systems live in a low-dimensional subspace (attractor). If the system is Markovian, the attractor is uniquely determined by the Markov operator that maps the evolution of infinitesimal time steps. This makes it possible to predict the behavior of the chaotic system by learning the Markov operator even if we cannot predict the exact trajectory. Recently, a new framework for learning resolution-invariant solution operators for PDEs was proposed, known as neural operators. In this work, we train a Markov neural operator (MNO) with only the local one-step evolution information. We then compose the learned operator to obtain the global attractor and invariant measure. Such a Markov neural operator forms a discrete semigroup and we empirically observe that does not collapse or blow up. Experiments show neural operators are more accurate and stable compared to previous methods on chaotic systems such as the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and Navier-Stokes equations.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Jun. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.06898v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of chaos theory, predicting the behavior of chaotic systems has always been a daunting task due to their inherent instability. The accumulation of small errors in simulating each time step often leads to completely different trajectories, making accurate predictions nearly impossible. However, researchers have discovered that the trajectories of many well-known chaotic systems actually reside within a low-dimensional subspace called an attractor. Remarkably, if a chaotic system is Markovian, meaning its future state depends solely on its current state and not on its past states, the attractor can be uniquely determined by a mathematical entity known as the Markov operator. This operator maps the evolution of infinitesimal time steps and provides valuable insights into the system's dynamics. Even though we may not be able to predict the exact trajectory of a chaotic system, learning this Markov operator enables us to forecast its overall behavior. Recently, a groundbreaking framework called neural operators has emerged for learning resolution-invariant solution operators for partial differential equations (PDEs). Building upon this framework, a team of researchers introduced a novel approach called Markov neural operators (MNO) specifically designed for learning chaotic systems. In their work, they trained an MNO using only local one-step evolution information. By composing the learned operator obtained from MNO, they were able to derive the global attractor and invariant measure of the chaotic system under study. Importantly, they observed that the Markov neural operator formed a discrete semigroup that neither collapsed nor blew up during their empirical experiments. The results demonstrated that neural operators are more accurate and stable compared to previous methods when applied to chaotic systems such as the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and Navier-Stokes equations. This breakthrough opens up new possibilities for predicting and understanding complex dynamical phenomena in various fields including physics, biology, and climate science. Overall, this research highlights how learning the Markov operator through neural operators can provide valuable insights into chaotic systems, enabling us to make predictions about their behavior even in the absence of precise trajectory information. The potential applications of this approach are vast and could revolutionize our understanding of complex systems.
Created on 07 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.