Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.14204v1

In their paper, "Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles," the authors apply quantitative finance methods and economic arguments to cryptocurrencies in general and bitcoin in particular. While acknowledging that there are about 10,000 cryptocurrencies, they focus on the most discussed crypto of those that claim to hew to the original protocol (Nakamoto, 2009) and the one with by far the largest market capitalization. The authors argue that despite all the hype surrounding bitcoin as a currency without government control, it has failed to satisfy this notion as it is not even a currency at all. They further contend that bitcoin cannot operate as a reliable inflation hedge nor can it be considered a safe haven for investments or a shield against government tyranny. The authors also discuss how there appears to be an underlying conflation between the success of a payment mechanism (as a decentralized mode of exchange), which so far has failed, and the speculative variations in the price of a zero-sum asset with massive negative externalities. Going through monetary history, they show how a true numeraire must be one of minimum variance with respect to an arbitrary basket of goods and services. To expand on their argument against bitcoin's supposed benefits, the authors cite several sources including M. Nair and R. Emozozo's article on electronic currency in Africa where they discuss M-pesa as private inside money; K. Colucci and C. Moiso's paper on virtual currencies' phenomenon; J. Murphy-O'Connor's work on Jesus and money changers; M.W Spitznagel's article on why cryptocurrencies will never be safe havens; D.Porechna's update on Darkside hacking incident from Wolfram Research. The authors also address some common misconceptions about Bitcoin such as its supposed democratic nature reducing agency problems perceived among civil servants and bankers when in reality there appears to be worse agency problem: insiders hoarding what they think will be the world currency so others would have to go to them later on for supply. They argue that this is a wealth transfer to the cartel of early bitcoin accumulators. In conclusion, the authors present their argument against Bitcoin's supposed benefits and question its usefulness as a technology. They state that they only judge a technology by how it solves problems not in what technological attributes it has.

• - The authors apply quantitative finance methods and economic arguments to cryptocurrencies in general and bitcoin in particular.
• - They focus on the most discussed crypto of those that claim to hew to the original protocol (Nakamoto, 2009) and the one with by far the largest market capitalization.
• - Bitcoin has failed to satisfy the notion of being a currency without government control as it is not even a currency at all.
• - Bitcoin cannot operate as a reliable inflation hedge nor can it be considered a safe haven for investments or a shield against government tyranny.
• - There appears to be an underlying conflation between the success of a payment mechanism (as a decentralized mode of exchange), which so far has failed, and the speculative variations in the price of a zero-sum asset with massive negative externalities.
• - A true numeraire must be one of minimum variance with respect to an arbitrary basket of goods and services.
• - The authors cite several sources including M. Nair and R. Emozozo's article on electronic currency in Africa where they discuss M-pesa as private inside money; K. Colucci and C. Moiso's paper on virtual currencies' phenomenon; J. Murphy-O'Connor's work on Jesus and money changers; M.W Spitznagel's article on why cryptocurrencies will never be safe havens; D.Porechna's update on Darkside hacking incident from Wolfram Research.
• - Common misconceptions about Bitcoin include its supposed democratic nature reducing agency problems perceived among civil servants and bankers when in reality there appears to be worse agency problem: insiders hoarding what they think will be the world currency so others would have to go to them later on for supply.
• - This is seen as a wealth transfer to the cartel of early bitcoin accumulators.
• - The authors question Bitcoin's usefulness as a technology, stating that they only judge a technology by how it solves problems not in what technological attributes it has.

The authors wrote about Bitcoin, which is a type of digital money. They said that it doesn't work well as a currency because it's not controlled by a government and its value changes too much. They also said that some people are keeping lots of Bitcoin to make themselves rich in the future, which isn't fair. The authors looked at other articles and studies to help them write their own article. They don't think Bitcoin is very useful because it doesn't solve any problems well. Definitions- Quantitative finance methods: using math and data to understand financial things - Cryptocurrencies: digital money that uses encryption techniques to keep transactions secure - Market capitalization: the total value of all the shares or units of something that are available for sale - Inflation hedge: something that keeps its value even when prices for other things go up - Safe haven: a place or thing where people can put their money during times of economic uncertainty or crisis - Numeraire: a standard unit used for measuring value in economics - Zero-sum asset: something where one person's gain is another person's loss - Externalities: effects on people or things outside of a transaction or decision

Error: needs to be re-run