Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond

AI-generated keywords: Causal Inference NLP Text Data Robustness Interpretability

AI-generated Key Points

  • Causal inference and natural language processing (NLP) are intersecting fields of research.
  • Causality has been extensively studied in life and social sciences but not as much in NLP.
  • There is an emerging area of interdisciplinary research combining causal inference and language processing.
  • Existing research on causality in NLP is scattered across different domains, lacking unified definitions, benchmark datasets, and clear articulations of challenges and opportunities.
  • This survey consolidates research from various academic areas and situates it within the broader NLP landscape.
  • The paper discusses the statistical challenge of estimating causal effects with text, covering scenarios where text is used as an outcome, treatment, or to address confounding.
  • Potential applications of causal inference in improving the robustness, fairness, and interpretability of NLP models are explored.
  • The concern about unobserved confounding between explicitly considered variables when using partial causal models is highlighted.
  • Using causal methodology forces practitioners to explicate their assumptions, which should be clearer in the NLP community for better scientific standards and understanding of language models.
  • The survey provides insights into how recent advances in NLP modeling can help draw causal conclusions with text data while highlighting challenges and open questions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Amir Feder, Katherine A. Keith, Emaad Manzoor, Reid Pryzant, Dhanya Sridhar, Zach Wood-Doughty, Jacob Eisenstein, Justin Grimmer, Roi Reichart, Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart, Victor Veitch, Diyi Yang

Accepted to Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: A fundamental goal of scientific research is to learn about causal relationships. However, despite its critical role in the life and social sciences, causality has not had the same importance in Natural Language Processing (NLP), which has traditionally placed more emphasis on predictive tasks. This distinction is beginning to fade, with an emerging area of interdisciplinary research at the convergence of causal inference and language processing. Still, research on causality in NLP remains scattered across domains without unified definitions, benchmark datasets and clear articulations of the challenges and opportunities in the application of causal inference to the textual domain, with its unique properties. In this survey, we consolidate research across academic areas and situate it in the broader NLP landscape. We introduce the statistical challenge of estimating causal effects with text, encompassing settings where text is used as an outcome, treatment, or to address confounding. In addition, we explore potential uses of causal inference to improve the robustness, fairness, and interpretability of NLP models. We thus provide a unified overview of causal inference for the NLP community.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Sep. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.00725v2

This survey paper explores the intersection of causal inference and natural language processing (NLP) and aims to provide a unified overview of causal inference for the NLP community. While causality has been extensively studied in the life and social sciences, it has not received the same level of attention in NLP, which has traditionally focused more on predictive tasks. However, there is an emerging area of interdisciplinary research that combines causal inference and language processing. The existing research on causality in NLP is scattered across different domains, lacking unified definitions, benchmark datasets, and clear articulations of challenges and opportunities specific to applying causal inference to textual data. This survey consolidates research from various academic areas and situates it within the broader NLP landscape. The paper introduces the statistical challenge of estimating causal effects with text, covering scenarios where text is used as an outcome, treatment, or to address confounding. It also explores potential applications of causal inference in improving the robustness, fairness, and interpretability of NLP models. One critical question for future work is how to safely use partial causal models that omit some variables and do not fully specify the causal relationships within text. The concern here is unobserved confounding between explicitly considered variables. The authors emphasize that using causal methodology forces practitioners to explicate their assumptions. They believe that the NLP community should be clearer about these assumptions and analyze their data using causal reasoning to improve scientific standards and gain a better understanding of language and the models built to process it. Overall, this survey provides insights into how recent advances in NLP modeling can help researchers draw causal conclusions with text data while highlighting challenges and open questions in this field.
Created on 25 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.