Is ChatGPT a Good Causal Reasoner? A Comprehensive Evaluation
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper evaluates ChatGPT's causal reasoning capabilities, which are important for NLP applications.
- Despite performing well in various NLP tasks, it is unclear how well ChatGPT performs in causal reasoning.
- Experiments were conducted using four versions of ChatGPT and the Event Causality Identification (ECI) task as a benchmark.
- Results show that ChatGPT is a good causal interpreter but not a good causal reasoner due to reporting biases and upgrading processes such as RLHF.
- In-Context Learning (ICL) and Chain-of-Thought (COT) techniques can exacerbate ChatGPT's causal hallucination.
- The ability of ChatGPT to reason causally is sensitive to the words used to express the causal concept in prompts, with close-ended prompts performing better than open-ended ones.
- ChatGPT excels at capturing explicit causality rather than implicit causality and performs better in sentences with lower event density and smaller lexical distance between events.
- F1 score was used as an evaluation metric for the experiments.
- This study provides insights into the limitations of current language models for understanding causality in natural language text.
Authors: Jinglong Gao, Xiao Ding, Bing Qin, Ting Liu
Abstract: Causal reasoning ability is crucial for numerous NLP applications. Despite the impressive emerging ability of ChatGPT in various NLP tasks, it is unclear how well ChatGPT performs in causal reasoning. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive evaluation of the ChatGPT's causal reasoning capabilities. Experiments show that ChatGPT is not a good causal reasoner, but a good causal interpreter. Besides, ChatGPT has a serious hallucination on causal reasoning, possibly due to the reporting biases between causal and non-causal relationships in natural language, as well as ChatGPT's upgrading processes, such as RLHF. The In-Context Learning (ICL) and Chain-of-Though (COT) techniques can further exacerbate such causal hallucination. Additionally, the causal reasoning ability of ChatGPT is sensitive to the words used to express the causal concept in prompts, and close-ended prompts perform better than open-ended prompts. For events in sentences, ChatGPT excels at capturing explicit causality rather than implicit causality, and performs better in sentences with lower event density and smaller lexical distance between events.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.