Resource sharing on endogenous networks
AI-generated Key Points
- The study examines behavior in a voluntary resource sharing game with endogenous network formation
- 184 subjects across 46 groups participated in the experiment conducted in two parts
- In the second part, subjects were shown how much benefit they received from each other subject in their group in the previous round to facilitate direct reciprocity
- Providing information about past behavior has a significant impact on efficiency and performance in the market
- Reciprocity is decomposed into direct and generalized/altruistic reciprocity, which helps players coordinate for mutually beneficial outcomes
- Network configurations that emerge from data are stable under parameter estimates while individual heterogeneity is another benefit of repeated-choice modeling paradigm explored by this study
- Robustness analysis is performed on estimators' performance on these data to provide insights into how information design can affect behavior in environments with endogenous network formation as well as highlight important implications for digital economies.
Authors: Philip Solimine, Luke Boosey
Abstract: We examine behavior in a voluntary resource sharing game that incorporates endogenous network formation; an incentive problem that is increasingly common in contemporary digital economies. By varying the information structure in a controlled laboratory experiment, we examine the underlying mechanisms of reciprocity that generate emergent patterns in linking and contribution decisions. Specifically, we vary whether players are given information about which other players in their group are sharing with them. Reduced-form estimates find significant effects of this information treatment on a number of key outcomes such as efficiency and balanced decentralization. To further understand the driving causes of these observed changes in behavior, we develop and estimate a discrete-choice framework, using computationally efficient panel methods to identify the structure of social preferences in this setting. We find that subjects react to this new information by focusing reciprocity, which helps players coordinate to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. We also find that direct and indirect reciprocity are not perfect substitutes, and this interaction further helps players support efficient outcomes.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.