Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.07055v2

In the current Artificial Intelligence boom, Natural Language Processing (NLP) has emerged as one of the leading application areas. Large deep learning neural networks trained on language modeling tasks have significantly improved performance in downstream language tasks through transfer learning. Interestingly, when these language models are trained with data that includes software code, they demonstrate remarkable abilities in generating functioning computer code from natural language specifications. However, this raises a conundrum for the claim that eliminative neural models are a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition as they eliminate the need for symbolic abstractions like generative phrase structure grammars. The syntax of programming languages is determined by phrase structure grammars and thus neural models that produce syntactic code do not provide any insight into the theoretical foundations of programming languages. The demonstration that neural models perform well on tasks involving clearly symbolic systems proves that they cannot be used to argue against the symbolic nature of language and other cognitive systems. As a result, it is argued that the term "language model" is misleading and should be replaced with "corpus model," which better reflects the genesis and contents of these models. In summary, while large language models have shown impressive capabilities in NLP tasks, their ability to generate functioning computer code does not necessarily imply a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition or undermine the symbolic nature of cognitive systems.

• - Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a leading application area in the current Artificial Intelligence boom
• - Large deep learning neural networks trained on language modeling tasks have significantly improved performance in downstream language tasks through transfer learning
• - Language models trained with data that includes software code can generate functioning computer code from natural language specifications
• - Eliminative neural models do not provide any insight into the theoretical foundations of programming languages as they eliminate the need for symbolic abstractions like generative phrase structure grammars
• - The term "language model" is misleading and should be replaced with "corpus model"
• - The ability of large language models to generate functioning computer code does not necessarily imply a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition or undermine the symbolic nature of cognitive systems.

Summary: Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a type of Artificial Intelligence that helps computers understand and use human language. Scientists have made big improvements in NLP by using large neural networks to learn how language works. These models can even generate computer code from written instructions! However, some types of models don't help us understand how programming languages work. Even though we call them "language models," they should really be called "corpus models." Finally, these new tools don't change everything we know about how people think and learn. Definitions- Natural Language Processing (NLP): A type of Artificial Intelligence that helps computers understand and use human language. - Neural networks: A type of computer program that can learn from examples and make predictions or decisions based on what it has learned. - Transfer learning: Using knowledge gained from one task to help with another task. - Code: Instructions for a computer program written in a specific programming language. - Corpus: A collection of written or spoken texts used for study or analysis.

Natural Language Processing and the Symbolic Nature of Cognitive Systems

The current Artificial Intelligence (AI) boom has seen a surge in Natural Language Processing (NLP), with large deep learning neural networks trained on language modeling tasks showing improved performance in downstream language tasks through transfer learning. These models have demonstrated remarkable abilities to generate functioning computer code from natural language specifications, raising questions about the symbolic nature of cognitive systems and their theoretical foundations. In this article, we will explore how these models perform on tasks involving clearly symbolic systems, and why the term “language model” may be misleading.

Neural Networks Generating Computer Code

In recent years, AI researchers have made significant progress in developing neural networks that can generate computer code from natural language specifications. This is an impressive feat considering the complexity of programming languages which are determined by phrase structure grammars – a set of rules for constructing sentences or phrases out of smaller components such as words or symbols. By training large deep learning neural networks with data that includes software code, they are able to produce syntactically correct programs from natural language instructions.

Eliminative Neural Models and Cognitive Systems

These developments have led some to argue that eliminative neural models – which eliminate the need for symbolic abstractions like generative phrase structure grammars – could represent a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition. However, while these models show impressive capabilities when it comes to generating functioning computer code, their ability to do so does not necessarily imply a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition or undermine the symbolic nature of cognitive systems.

Language Model vs Corpus Model

This raises an important question: Is “language model” an accurate description for these types of neural networks? It appears that this term may be misleading; rather than being based on linguistic principles alone, these models are largely based on corpus-based approaches where data is collected from existing sources such as text documents or software code repositories. As such, it may be more appropriate to refer to them as “corpus models” instead since this better reflects their genesis and contents.

Conclusion

To conclude, while large language models have shown impressive capabilities in NLP tasks including generating functioning computer codes from natural language specifications, their ability to do so does not necessarily imply a radical restructuring in our understanding of cognition or undermine the symbolic nature of cognitive systems. The term “language model” is therefore misleading and should be replaced with “corpus model” which better reflects its genesis and contents.