Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher

AI-generated keywords: Language Model Performance Scale Bias Toxicity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper analyzes the performance of Transformer-based language models across different scales, including a 280 billion parameter model called Gopher.
  • The evaluation of these models on 152 tasks shows state-of-the-art performance in most areas.
  • Larger models yield significant gains in reading comprehension, fact-checking, and identifying toxic language.
  • Logical and mathematical reasoning tasks show less improvement with increased model scale.
  • The paper explores how model scale intersects with bias and toxicity issues.
  • The authors discuss the application of language models in enhancing AI safety and mitigating potential harms.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor, Irina Higgins, Antonia Creswell, Nat McAleese, Amy Wu, Erich Elsen, Siddhant Jayakumar, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Esme Sutherland, Karen Simonyan, Michela Paganini, Laurent Sifre, Lena Martens, Xiang Lorraine Li, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Aida Nematzadeh, Elena Gribovskaya, Domenic Donato, Angeliki Lazaridou, Arthur Mensch, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Maria Tsimpoukelli, Nikolai Grigorev, Doug Fritz, Thibault Sottiaux, Mantas Pajarskas, Toby Pohlen, Zhitao Gong, Daniel Toyama, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Yujia Li, Tayfun Terzi, Vladimir Mikulik, Igor Babuschkin, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Chris Jones, James Bradbury, Matthew Johnson, Blake Hechtman, Laura Weidinger, Iason Gabriel, William Isaac, Ed Lockhart, Simon Osindero, Laura Rimell, Chris Dyer, Oriol Vinyals, Kareem Ayoub, Jeff Stanway, Lorrayne Bennett, Demis Hassabis, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Geoffrey Irving

118 pages

Abstract: Language modelling provides a step towards intelligent communication systems by harnessing large repositories of written human knowledge to better predict and understand the world. In this paper, we present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales -- from models with tens of millions of parameters up to a 280 billion parameter model called Gopher. These models are evaluated on 152 diverse tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance across the majority. Gains from scale are largest in areas such as reading comprehension, fact-checking, and the identification of toxic language, but logical and mathematical reasoning see less benefit. We provide a holistic analysis of the training dataset and model's behaviour, covering the intersection of model scale with bias and toxicity. Finally we discuss the application of language models to AI safety and the mitigation of downstream harms.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.11446v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher," the authors analyze the performance of Transformer-based language models across various scales, ranging from models with tens of millions of parameters to a massive 280 billion parameter model called Gopher. The evaluation of these models on 152 diverse tasks reveals that they achieve state-of-the-art performance in most areas. The study finds that larger models yield significant gains in reading comprehension, fact-checking, and identifying toxic language. However, logical and mathematical reasoning tasks show less improvement with increased model scale. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of both the training dataset and the behavior of the language models. It specifically explores how model scale intersects with bias and toxicity issues. Additionally, the authors discuss the application of language models to enhance AI safety and mitigate potential harms. The research is authored by Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford Tom Hennigan Jacob Menick Albin Cassirer Richard Powell George van den Driessche Lisa Anne Hendricks Maribeth Rauh Po-Sen Huang Amelia Glaese Johannes Welbl Sumanth Dathathri Saffron Huang Jonathan Uesato John Mellor Irina Higgins Antonia Creswell Nat McAleese Amy Wu Erich Elsen Siddhant Jayakumar Elena Buchatskaya David Budden and others. Overall summary: This paper presents an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance at different scales and evaluates their effectiveness on various tasks. The findings highlight the benefits of larger models in certain areas while discussing their implications for bias and toxicity issues. The authors also explore the application of these language models in enhancing AI safety and mitigating potential harms.
Created on 22 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.