Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Training Data Extraction Attack GPT-2 Nicholas Carlini Privacy and Security Risks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models with billions of parameters trained on private datasets are becoming more common
  • A study by Nicholas Carlini and his team shows that these models are vulnerable to a training data extraction attack
  • The researchers targeted GPT-2 and successfully extracted hundreds of verbatim text sequences from its training data
  • Extracted examples include personally identifiable information, IRC conversations, code snippets, and UUIDs
  • Each sequence only appeared in one document within the training data, making the attack alarming
  • Larger language models are more susceptible to this type of attack compared to smaller ones
  • Stronger safeguards are needed when training large language models to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information
  • Privacy and security risks arise from deploying language models trained on private datasets
  • Robust security measures should be implemented during the development and deployment process of large language models to protect against unauthorized access.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom Brown, Dawn Song, Ulfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea, Colin Raffel

Abstract: It has become common to publish large (billion parameter) language models that have been trained on private datasets. This paper demonstrates that in such settings, an adversary can perform a training data extraction attack to recover individual training examples by querying the language model. We demonstrate our attack on GPT-2, a language model trained on scrapes of the public Internet, and are able to extract hundreds of verbatim text sequences from the model's training data. These extracted examples include (public) personally identifiable information (names, phone numbers, and email addresses), IRC conversations, code, and 128-bit UUIDs. Our attack is possible even though each of the above sequences are included in just one document in the training data. We comprehensively evaluate our extraction attack to understand the factors that contribute to its success. For example, we find that larger models are more vulnerable than smaller models. We conclude by drawing lessons and discussing possible safeguards for training large language models.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2012.07805v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, there has been a rise in the publication of large language models with billions of parameters that have been trained on private datasets. However, a new study conducted by Nicholas Carlini and his team demonstrates that these models are vulnerable to a training data extraction attack. The researchers specifically targeted GPT-2, a language model trained on publicly available internet data, and were able to successfully extract hundreds of verbatim text sequences from the model's training data. The extracted examples obtained through the attack include personally identifiable information such as names, phone numbers, email addresses as well as IRC conversations, code snippets and 128-bit UUIDs. What makes this attack particularly alarming is that each of these sequences only appeared in one document within the training data. To gain a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to the success of their extraction attack, the researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation. They found that larger language models are more susceptible to this type of attack compared to smaller ones. The implications of this research are significant for both developers and users of large language models as it highlights the need for stronger safeguards when training such models to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information. It also raises concerns about privacy and security risks associated with deploying language models trained on private datasets. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the potential vulnerabilities in large language models and emphasizes the importance of implementing robust security measures during their development and deployment process in order to protect against unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Created on 04 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.