This study addresses challenges in selecting and implementing Microservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies. Through an extensive search process of 38 scientific studies and 22 grey literature sources, a total of 211 patterns and strategies from scientific sources and 174 from grey literature were identified in four key MSA design areas. Common naming conventions were established to streamline the identification process, resulting in the final selection of 7 distinct patterns and strategies for application decomposition. Decision models were then developed based on these patterns and strategies to aid practitioners in making informed choices aligned with quality attributes crucial for microservices systems. Empirical evaluations with 24 microservices practitioners were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the decision models. The paper is structured into sections detailing research methodology, specifics of the decision models, evaluation outcomes, threats to validity considerations, related work analysis, and concluding remarks with implications for future research directions. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing decision-making processes related to microservices architecture through comprehensive pattern-based approaches supported by practitioner feedback.
- Extensive search process identified 211 patterns and strategies from scientific sources and 174 from grey literature in four key MSA design areas
- Common naming conventions established to streamline identification process, resulting in final selection of 7 distinct patterns and strategies for application decomposition
- Decision models developed based on these patterns and strategies to aid practitioners in making informed choices aligned with quality attributes crucial for microservices systems
- Empirical evaluations conducted with 24 microservices practitioners to assess effectiveness of decision models
- Paper structured into sections detailing research methodology, specifics of decision models, evaluation outcomes, threats to validity considerations, related work analysis, and concluding remarks with implications for future research directions
SummaryResearchers found many different ways to design microservices systems by looking at a lot of information. They chose the best ideas and made them easier to understand by giving them special names. These ideas help people make good decisions when creating microservices systems that work well. They tested these ideas with real experts to see if they were helpful. The research paper is organized into sections that explain how the study was done, what they found, and what it means for future research.
Definitions- Extensive: Very thorough or detailed
- Patterns: Common ways of doing things or recurring themes
- Strategies: Plans or methods used to achieve a goal
- Decomposition: Breaking something down into smaller parts
- Empirical: Based on observation or experience rather than theory
Microservices Architecture (MSA) has gained significant attention in recent years as a popular approach for building complex and scalable software systems. However, with the increasing adoption of MSA, there are also challenges that arise in selecting and implementing the right patterns and strategies to ensure its success. In order to address these challenges, a research paper titled "Patterns and Strategies for Microservices Architecture: A Systematic Mapping Study" was conducted by a team of researchers from various universities.
The main objective of this study was to identify common patterns and strategies used in MSA design, develop decision models based on these patterns, and evaluate their effectiveness through empirical evaluations with microservices practitioners. The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of 38 scientific studies and 22 grey literature sources, resulting in the identification of 211 patterns and strategies from scientific sources and 174 from grey literature.
To streamline the identification process, the researchers established common naming conventions for the identified patterns and strategies. This resulted in the final selection of 7 distinct patterns and strategies for application decomposition – Service Decomposition Pattern, Domain-Driven Design Pattern, Event-Driven Architecture Pattern, API Gateway Pattern, Circuit Breaker Pattern, Database Per Service Strategy, and Shared Database Strategy.
Based on these selected patterns and strategies, decision models were developed to aid practitioners in making informed choices aligned with quality attributes crucial for microservices systems such as scalability, maintainability, availability etc. These decision models provide a structured approach for practitioners to select appropriate MSA design options based on their specific requirements.
In order to assess the effectiveness of these decision models in real-world scenarios, empirical evaluations were conducted with 24 microservices practitioners. The results showed that the decision models provided valuable guidance in making decisions related to MSA design. They also highlighted some limitations which can be addressed through further research.
The paper is structured into different sections providing detailed information about each aspect of the study. The research methodology section explains how the study was conducted, including the search process and selection criteria for identifying patterns and strategies. The specifics of the decision models are then discussed in detail, providing a clear understanding of how they were developed.
The evaluation outcomes section presents the results of the empirical evaluations with practitioners, highlighting their feedback on the decision models. This is followed by a discussion on potential threats to validity that could affect the study's findings. A thorough analysis of related work is also included, comparing this study's findings with previous research in this area.
In conclusion, this research paper provides valuable insights into enhancing decision-making processes related to microservices architecture through comprehensive pattern-based approaches supported by practitioner feedback. It offers a structured approach for practitioners to select appropriate MSA design options based on their specific requirements and highlights areas for further research in this field. Overall, this study contributes towards improving the success rate of MSA implementations and can serve as a useful resource for both researchers and practitioners in this domain.
