Towards Loosely-Coupling Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Ontology-based Reasoning

AI-generated keywords: Knowledge Graph Completion

AI-generated Key Points

  • Knowledge graph completion, also known as link prediction, infers missing information from knowledge graphs
  • Existing approaches relying solely on input knowledge graph often yield unsatisfactory results
  • Proposed approach combines knowledge graph embeddings with domain-specific reasoning to improve accuracy
  • Combination of techniques enhances prediction accuracy by incorporating domain knowledge not explicitly included in the input knowledge graph
  • Users can integrate their own knowledge graph embedding and reasoning methods
  • Initial results show significant improvements in mean reciprocal rank (MRR) accuracy compared to vanilla knowledge graph embeddings
  • Outperforms hybrid solutions that combine knowledge graph embeddings with rule mining and reasoning by up to 3.5 times MRR
  • Evaluations conducted using synthetic and real-world knowledge graphs including DBPedia and LUBM datasets
  • Subset of DBPedia used due to computational limitations, consisting of a well-connected subgraph with 12 popular relations and related information
  • Approach compared against several baseline models including TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, HolE, ConvE, KALE, and plogicNet
  • Consistent hyperparameter settings used for both vanilla KGEs (knowledge graph embeddings) and proposed approach
  • Experimentation conducted on a machine with an AMD Opteron processor running at 32x2.3 GHz, 62GB RAM, and an NVIDIA GPU.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zoi Kaoudi, Abelardo Carlos Martinez Lorenzo, Volker Markl

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (a.k.a.~link prediction), i.e.,~the task of inferring missing information from knowledge graphs, is a widely used task in many applications, such as product recommendation and question answering. The state-of-the-art approaches of knowledge graph embeddings and/or rule mining and reasoning are data-driven and, thus, solely based on the information the input knowledge graph contains. This leads to unsatisfactory prediction results which make such solutions inapplicable to crucial domains such as healthcare. To further enhance the accuracy of knowledge graph completion we propose to loosely-couple the data-driven power of knowledge graph embeddings with domain-specific reasoning stemming from experts or entailment regimes (e.g., OWL2). In this way, we not only enhance the prediction accuracy with domain knowledge that may not be included in the input knowledge graph but also allow users to plugin their own knowledge graph embedding and reasoning method. Our initial results show that we enhance the MRR accuracy of vanilla knowledge graph embeddings by up to 3x and outperform hybrid solutions that combine knowledge graph embeddings with rule mining and reasoning up to 3.5x MRR.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Feb. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.03173v2

Knowledge graph completion, also known as link prediction, is a task that involves inferring missing information from knowledge graphs. It is widely used in various applications such as product recommendation and question answering. However, existing approaches to knowledge graph completion, which rely solely on the information present in the input knowledge graph, often yield unsatisfactory results. This limitation makes these solutions inadequate for critical domains like healthcare. To address this issue and improve the accuracy of knowledge graph completion, we propose a novel approach that combines the data-driven power of knowledge graph embeddings with domain-specific reasoning derived from experts or entailment regimes like OWL2. By loosely coupling these two techniques, we not only enhance prediction accuracy by incorporating domain knowledge that may not be explicitly included in the input knowledge graph but also allow users to integrate their own knowledge graph embedding and reasoning methods. Our initial results demonstrate significant improvements in mean reciprocal rank (MRR) accuracy compared to vanilla knowledge graph embeddings. We achieve up to 3 times enhancement in MRR accuracy and outperform hybrid solutions that combine knowledge graph embeddings with rule mining and reasoning by up to 3.5 times MRR. In order to validate our proposal, we conducted evaluations using both synthetic and real-world knowledge graphs. The datasets used include DBPedia (a real-world KG accompanied by an ontology) and LUBM (a popular synthetic KG generator). Due to computational limitations, we worked with a subset of DBPedia containing a well-connected subgraph consisting of the 12 most popular relations and related information. We compared our approach against several baseline models including TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, HolE, ConvE, KALE, and plogicNet. For each dataset and model, we utilized consistent hyperparameter settings for both vanilla KGEs (knowledge graph embeddings) and our approach. The hardware used for experimentation consisted of a machine with an AMD Opteron processor running at 32x2.3 GHz, 62GB RAM, and an NVIDIA GPU.
Created on 31 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.