Towards Loosely-Coupling Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Ontology-based Reasoning
AI-generated Key Points
- Knowledge graph completion, also known as link prediction, infers missing information from knowledge graphs
- Existing approaches relying solely on input knowledge graph often yield unsatisfactory results
- Proposed approach combines knowledge graph embeddings with domain-specific reasoning to improve accuracy
- Combination of techniques enhances prediction accuracy by incorporating domain knowledge not explicitly included in the input knowledge graph
- Users can integrate their own knowledge graph embedding and reasoning methods
- Initial results show significant improvements in mean reciprocal rank (MRR) accuracy compared to vanilla knowledge graph embeddings
- Outperforms hybrid solutions that combine knowledge graph embeddings with rule mining and reasoning by up to 3.5 times MRR
- Evaluations conducted using synthetic and real-world knowledge graphs including DBPedia and LUBM datasets
- Subset of DBPedia used due to computational limitations, consisting of a well-connected subgraph with 12 popular relations and related information
- Approach compared against several baseline models including TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, HolE, ConvE, KALE, and plogicNet
- Consistent hyperparameter settings used for both vanilla KGEs (knowledge graph embeddings) and proposed approach
- Experimentation conducted on a machine with an AMD Opteron processor running at 32x2.3 GHz, 62GB RAM, and an NVIDIA GPU.
Authors: Zoi Kaoudi, Abelardo Carlos Martinez Lorenzo, Volker Markl
Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (a.k.a.~link prediction), i.e.,~the task of inferring missing information from knowledge graphs, is a widely used task in many applications, such as product recommendation and question answering. The state-of-the-art approaches of knowledge graph embeddings and/or rule mining and reasoning are data-driven and, thus, solely based on the information the input knowledge graph contains. This leads to unsatisfactory prediction results which make such solutions inapplicable to crucial domains such as healthcare. To further enhance the accuracy of knowledge graph completion we propose to loosely-couple the data-driven power of knowledge graph embeddings with domain-specific reasoning stemming from experts or entailment regimes (e.g., OWL2). In this way, we not only enhance the prediction accuracy with domain knowledge that may not be included in the input knowledge graph but also allow users to plugin their own knowledge graph embedding and reasoning method. Our initial results show that we enhance the MRR accuracy of vanilla knowledge graph embeddings by up to 3x and outperform hybrid solutions that combine knowledge graph embeddings with rule mining and reasoning up to 3.5x MRR.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.