A Conversational Paradigm for Program Synthesis

AI-generated keywords: Program Synthesis Language Models Conversational Interactions Multi-Turn Programming Benchmark (MTPB) HumanEval Benchmark

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors propose a conversational program synthesis approach using large language models
  • Approach treats program synthesis as a multi-turn conversation between user and system
  • Program synthesis formulated as a sequence prediction problem with natural language specification and conditional sampling of desired program
  • Model called CodeGen trained on large language models for both natural language and programming language data
  • Conversational capabilities emerge from autoregressive language modeling with weak supervision and scaling up data size and model size
  • Multi-turn programming benchmark (MTPB) developed to evaluate model's behavior on conversational program synthesis
  • Paradigm effectively addresses challenges of searching over vast program space and capturing user intent accurately
  • CodeGen outperforms OpenAI's Codex on HumanEval benchmark when trained with up to 16B parameters on TPU-v4
  • Authors plan to release JaxFormer, which includes checkpoints from their training library, as open source
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang, Yingbo Zhou, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong

Abstract: Program synthesis strives to generate a computer program as a solution to a given problem specification. We propose a conversational program synthesis approach via large language models, which addresses the challenges of searching over a vast program space and user intent specification faced in prior approaches. Our new approach casts the process of writing a specification and program as a multi-turn conversation between a user and a system. It treats program synthesis as a sequence prediction problem, in which the specification is expressed in natural language and the desired program is conditionally sampled. We train a family of large language models, called CodeGen, on natural language and programming language data. With weak supervision in the data and the scaling up of data size and model size, conversational capacities emerge from the simple autoregressive language modeling. To study the model behavior on conversational program synthesis, we develop a multi-turn programming benchmark (MTPB), where solving each problem requires multi-step synthesis via multi-turn conversation between the user and the model. Our findings show the emergence of conversational capabilities and the effectiveness of the proposed conversational program synthesis paradigm. In addition, our model CodeGen (with up to 16B parameters trained on TPU-v4) outperforms OpenAI's Codex on the HumanEval benchmark. We plan to make the training library JaxFormer including checkpoints available as open source.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.13474v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "A Conversational Paradigm for Program Synthesis," authors Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang, Yingbo Zhou, Silvio Savarese, and Caiming Xiong propose a novel approach to program synthesis using large language models. Program synthesis involves generating a computer program as a solution to a given problem specification. The authors' conversational program synthesis approach aims to overcome the challenges faced by previous methods in searching through a vast program space and accurately capturing user intent. The proposed approach treats the process of writing a specification and program as a multi-turn conversation between a user and a system. It formulates program synthesis as a sequence prediction problem where the specification is expressed in natural language, and the desired program is conditionally sampled. To train their model called CodeGen, the authors use large language models trained on both natural language and programming language data. By leveraging weak supervision in the data and scaling up data size and model size, the authors observe that conversational capabilities emerge from simple autoregressive language modeling. To evaluate their model's behavior on conversational program synthesis, they develop a multi-turn programming benchmark (MTPB). Solving each problem in this benchmark requires multi-step synthesis through multiple turns of conversation between the user and the model. The findings of their study demonstrate the effectiveness of this paradigm in addressing challenges related to searching over a vast program space and accurately capturing user intent. Additionally, they show that CodeGen outperforms OpenAI's Codex on the HumanEval benchmark when trained with up to 16B parameters on TPU-v4. The authors plan to release JaxFormer which includes checkpoints from their training library as open source. Overall, this paper presents an innovative approach to program synthesis that leverages large language models and conversational interactions between users and systems. The results highlight the effectiveness of this paradigm in addressing challenges related to searching over a vast program space and accurately capturing user intent.
Created on 28 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.