Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering

AI-generated keywords: ChatExtract Conversational Language Model Data Extraction Prompt Engineering Automation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Growing interest in automating data extraction from research papers using natural language processing and language models
  • Proposed method called ChatExtract that leverages conversational language models for accurate data extraction with minimal effort and background knowledge
  • Utilizes engineered prompts to identify relevant data sentences and extract information
  • Includes follow-up questions to ensure correctness of extracted information
  • Overcomes challenges associated with large language models providing inaccurate responses
  • Achieves high-quality data extraction results with precision and recall rates close to 90%
  • Information retention capabilities of conversational models combined with purposeful redundancy and introducing uncertainty through follow-up prompts contribute to exceptional performance
  • Similar approaches likely to become powerful tools for automated data extraction in the future due to simplicity, transferability, and accuracy
  • Application example: databases developed for critical cooling rates of metallic glasses and yield strengths of high entropy alloys using ChatExtract
  • Innovative method for automating accurate data extraction from research papers using conversational language models and prompt engineering has potential as an effective tool for extracting valuable information from scientific literature in various domains.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Maciej P. Polak, Dane Morgan

7 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

Abstract: There has been a growing effort to replace hand extraction of data from research papers with automated data extraction based on natural language processing, language models, and recently, large language models (LLMs). Although these methods enable efficient extraction of data from large sets of research papers, they require a significant amount of up-front effort, expertise, and coding. In this work we propose the ChatExtract method that can fully automate very accurate data extraction with minimal initial effort and background, using an advanced conversational LLM. ChatExtract consists of a set of engineered prompts applied to a conversational LLM that both identify sentences with data, extract that data, and assure the data's correctness through a series of follow-up questions. These follow-up questions largely overcome known issues with LLMs providing factually inaccurate responses. ChatExtract can be applied with any conversational LLMs and yields very high quality data extraction. In tests on materials data we find precision and recall both close to 90% from the best conversational LLMs, like ChatGPT-4. We demonstrate that the exceptional performance is enabled by the information retention in a conversational model combined with purposeful redundancy and introducing uncertainty through follow-up prompts. These results suggest that approaches similar to ChatExtract, due to their simplicity, transferability, and accuracy are likely to become powerful tools for data extraction in the near future. Finally, databases for critical cooling rates of metallic glasses and yield strengths of high entropy alloys are developed using ChatExtract.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.05352v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in automating the extraction of data from research papers using natural language processing and language models. To address this issue, the authors propose a new method called ChatExtract that leverages advanced conversational language models to automate accurate data extraction with minimal initial effort and background knowledge. ChatExtract utilizes a set of engineered prompts applied to a conversational language model. These prompts help identify sentences containing relevant data and extract that data. Additionally, the method includes a series of follow-up questions to ensure the correctness of the extracted information. This approach overcomes known challenges associated with large language models providing inaccurate responses. The authors demonstrate that ChatExtract can be applied with any conversational language model and achieves high-quality data extraction results with precision and recall rates close to 90%. The exceptional performance is attributed to the information retention capabilities of conversational models combined with purposeful redundancy and introducing uncertainty through follow-up prompts. The study suggests that approaches similar to ChatExtract are likely to become powerful tools for automated data extraction in the future due to their simplicity, transferability, and accuracy. As an application example, databases for critical cooling rates of metallic glasses and yield strengths of high entropy alloys are developed using ChatExtract. Overall, this research presents an innovative method for automating accurate data extraction from research papers using conversational language models and prompt engineering which highlights its potential as an effective tool for extracting valuable information from scientific literature in various domains.
Created on 05 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.