Into the Depths: a new activity metric for high-precision radial velocity measurements based on line depth variations
Authors: Jared C. Siegel, Ryan A. Rubenzahl, Samuel Halverson, Andrew W. Howard
Abstract: The discovery and characterization of extrasolar planets using radial velocity (RV) measurements is limited by noise sources from the surfaces of host stars. Current techniques to suppress stellar magnetic activity rely on decorrelation using an activity indicator (e.g., strength of the Ca II lines, width of the cross-correlation function, broadband photometry) or measurement of the RVs using only a subset of spectral lines that have been shown to be insensitive to activity. Here, we combine the above techniques by constructing a high signal-to-noise activity indicator, the depth metric $\mathcal{D}(t)$, from the most activity-sensitive spectral lines using the "line-by-line" method of Dumusque (2018). Analogous to photometric decorrelation of RVs or Gaussian progress regression modeling of activity indices, time series modeling of $\mathcal{D}(t)$ reduces the amplitude of magnetic activity in RV measurements; in an $\alpha$CenB RV time series from HARPS, the RV RMS was reduced from 2.67 to 1.02 m s$^{-1}$. $\mathcal{D}(t)$ modeling enabled us to characterize injected planetary signals as small as 1 m s$^{-1}$. In terms of noise reduction and injected signal recovery, $\mathcal{D}(t)$ modeling outperforms activity mitigation via the selection of activity-insensitive spectral lines. For Sun-like stars with activity signals on the m s$^{-1}$ level, the depth metric independently tracks rotationally modulated and multiyear stellar activity with a level of quality similar to that of the FWHM of the CCF and log$R^{\prime}_{HK}$. The depth metric and its elaborations will be a powerful tool in the mitigation of stellar magnetic activity, particularly as a means of connecting stellar activity to physical processes within host stars.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.