JWST NIRCam Defocused Imaging: Photometric Stability Performance and How it Can Sense Mirror Tilts
Authors: Everett Schlawin, Thomas Beatty, Brian Brooks, Nikolay K. Nikolov, Thomas P. Greene, Néstor Espinoza, Kayli Glidic, Keith Baka, Eiichi Egami, John Stansberry, Martha Boyer, Mario Gennaro, Jarron Leisenring, Bryan Hilbert, Karl Misselt, Doug Kelly, Alicia Canipe, Charles Beichman, Matteo Correnti, J. Scott Knight, Alden Jurling, Marshall D. Perrin, Lee D. Feinberg, Michael W. McElwain, Nicholas Bond, David Ciardi, Sarah Kendrew, Marcia Rieke
AI-generated Key Points
- The study analyzes the performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) during commissioning.
- NIRCam achieved short wavelength precision of 152 ppm per 27 second integration, which is within 50% of theoretical photon noise and read noise.
- Charge trapping ramp and persistence effects were well fit by an exponential function with short characteristic timescales.
- Defocused photometry obtained with NIRCam is uniquely suited to measure the real-time wavefront error of JWST.
- Two different hexagonal primary mirror segments exhibited "tilt events" that can be sensed by simultaneous longer-wavelength NIRCam grism spectral images or using difference images from the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument.
- Systematic effects in data include observed non-linearity and minor deviations from linear behavior in the first few groups of each integration, potentially impacting absolute fluxes and transit depths on bright targets where only a handful of groups are possible.
- The study provides valuable insights into JWST's performance during commissioning and demonstrates its potential for high precision time series measurements for exoplanet science.
Abstract: We use JWST NIRCam short wavelength photometry to capture a transit lightcurve of the exoplanet HAT-P-14 b to assess performance as part of instrument commissioning. The short wavelength precision is 152 ppm per 27 second integration as measured over the full time series compared to a theoretical limit of 107 ppm, after corrections to spatially correlated 1/f noise. Persistence effects from charge trapping are well fit by an exponential function with short characteristic timescales, settling on the order of 5-15 minutes. The short wavelength defocused photometry is also uniquely well suited to measure the realtime wavefront error of JWST. Analysis of the images and reconstructed wavefront maps indicate that two different hexagonal primary mirror segments exhibited "tilt events" where they changed orientation rapidly in less than ~1.4 seconds. In some cases, the magnitude and timing of the flux jumps caused by tilt events can be accurately predicted with a telescope model. These tilt events can be sensed by simultaneous longer-wavelength NIRCam grism spectral images alone in the form of changes to the point spread function, diagnosed from the FWHM. They can also be sensed with the FGS instrument from difference images. Tilt events possibly from sudden releases of stress in the backplane structure behind the mirrors were expected during the commissioning period because they were found in ground-based testing. Tilt events have shown signs of decreasing in frequency but have not disappeared completely. The detectors exhibit some minor (less than 1%) deviations from linear behavior in the first few groups of each integration, potentially impacting absolute fluxes and transit depths on bright targets where only a handful of groups are possible. Overall, the noise is within 50% of the theoretical photon noise and read noise. This bodes well for high precision time series measurements.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.