AI summary · arXiv: 2211.16727v1 · astro-ph.IM

JWST NIRCam Defocused Imaging: Photometric Stability Performance and How it Can Sense Mirror Tilts

Everett Schlawin, Thomas Beatty, Brian Brooks, Nikolay K. Nikolov, Thomas P. Greene, Néstor Espinoza, Kayli Glidic, Keith Baka,

and 20 more authorsEiichi Egami, John Stansberry, Martha Boyer, Mario Gennaro, Jarron Leisenring, Bryan Hilbert, Karl Misselt, Doug Kelly, Alicia Canipe, Charles Beichman, Matteo Correnti, J. Scott Knight, Alden Jurling, Marshall D. Perrin, Lee D. Feinberg, Michael W. McElwain, Nicholas Bond, David Ciardi, Sarah Kendrew, Marcia Rieke

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 30 Nov. 2022 PASP, Accepted for Publication License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • The study analyzes the performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) during commissioning.
  • NIRCam achieved short wavelength precision of 152 ppm per 27 second integration, which is within 50% of theoretical photon noise and read noise.
  • Charge trapping ramp and persistence effects were well fit by an exponential function with short characteristic timescales.
  • Defocused photometry obtained with NIRCam is uniquely suited to measure the real-time wavefront error of JWST.
  • Two different hexagonal primary mirror segments exhibited "tilt events" that can be sensed by simultaneous longer-wavelength NIRCam grism spectral images or using difference images from the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument.
  • Systematic effects in data include observed non-linearity and minor deviations from linear behavior in the first few groups of each integration, potentially impacting absolute fluxes and transit depths on bright targets where only a handful of groups are possible.
  • The study provides valuable insights into JWST's performance during commissioning and demonstrates its potential for high precision time series measurements for exoplanet science.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: JWST NIRCam Exoplanet Wavefront Error Charge Trapping

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This study presents an analysis of the performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) during commissioning, using observations of the exoplanet HAT-P-14 b. The short wavelength precision achieved with NIRCam is found to be 152 ppm per 27 second integration, which is within 50% of the theoretical photon noise and read noise. The charge trapping ramp and persistence effects from charge trapping are well fit by an exponential function with short characteristic timescales, settling on the order of 5-15 minutes. The defocused photometry obtained with NIRCam is also uniquely well suited to measure the real-time wavefront error of JWST. Analysis of the images and reconstructed wavefront maps indicate that two different hexagonal primary mirror segments exhibited "tilt events" where they changed orientation rapidly in less than ~1.4 seconds. These tilt events can be sensed by simultaneous longer-wavelength NIRCam grism spectral images alone in the form of changes to the point spread function or by using difference images from the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument. Furthermore, this study highlights systematic effects in data including observed non-linearity and minor deviations from linear behavior in the first few groups of each integration which could potentially impact absolute fluxes and transit depths on bright targets where only a handful of groups are possible. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into JWST's performance during commissioning and demonstrates its potential for high precision time series measurements for exoplanet science.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.