Accurate Model of the Projected Velocity Distribution of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Aung et al. present a highly accurate model for the line-of-sight velocity distribution of galaxies around dark matter halos.
- The model is developed and tested using synthetic galaxy catalogs generated with the UniverseMachine run on the Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations.
- The authors focus on understanding the kinematics of galaxies around clusters and decompose them into three distinct classes: orbiting, infalling, and interloping galaxies.
- These three types of galaxies can be statistically distinguished using only projected line-of-sight velocity information.
- The halo edge radius inferred from the line-of-sight velocity dispersion serves as an excellent proxy for the three-dimensional halo edge radius.
- Accurate recovery of the full velocity dispersion profile for each population of galaxies is possible.
- Orbiting and infalling galaxies have five independent parameters in their velocity dispersion profiles, including three radial scales and two velocity dispersion amplitudes, all correlated with mass.
- Redundancies in the velocity dispersion profiles allow for nontrivial systematics checks from a single data set, providing valuable insights into galaxy cluster properties and enabling more robust cosmological and astrophysical constraints.
- Potential applications of this new model include detecting the edge radius of halos and constraining cosmology and astrophysics using upcoming spectroscopic surveys.
Authors: Han Aung, Daisuke Nagai, Eduardo Rozo, Brandon Wolfe, Susmita Adhikari
Abstract: We present a percent-level accurate model of the line-of-sight velocity distribution of galaxies around dark matter halos as a function of projected radius and halo mass. The model is developed and tested using synthetic galaxy catalogs generated with the UniverseMachine run on the Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations. The model decomposes the galaxies around a cluster into three kinematically distinct classes: orbiting, infalling, and interloping galaxies. We demonstrate that: 1) we can statistically distinguish between these three types of galaxies using only projected line-of-sight velocity information; 2) the halo edge radius inferred from the line-of-sight velocity dispersion is an excellent proxy for the three-dimensional halo edge radius; 3) we can accurately recover the full velocity dispersion profile for each of the three populations of galaxies. Importantly, the velocity dispersion profiles of the orbiting and infalling galaxies contain five independent parameters -- three distinct radial scales and two velocity dispersion amplitudes -- each of which is correlated with mass. Thus, the velocity dispersion profile of galaxy clusters has inherent redundancies that allow us to perform nontrivial systematics check from a single data set. We discuss several potential applications of our new model for detecting the edge radius and constraining cosmology and astrophysics using upcoming spectroscopic surveys.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.