Accurate Model of the Projected Velocity Distribution of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos

AI-generated keywords: Galaxy Kinematics Dark Matter Halos Velocity Dispersion Profile Edge Radius Synthetic Galaxy Catalogs

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Aung et al. present a highly accurate model for the line-of-sight velocity distribution of galaxies around dark matter halos.
  • The model is developed and tested using synthetic galaxy catalogs generated with the UniverseMachine run on the Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations.
  • The authors focus on understanding the kinematics of galaxies around clusters and decompose them into three distinct classes: orbiting, infalling, and interloping galaxies.
  • These three types of galaxies can be statistically distinguished using only projected line-of-sight velocity information.
  • The halo edge radius inferred from the line-of-sight velocity dispersion serves as an excellent proxy for the three-dimensional halo edge radius.
  • Accurate recovery of the full velocity dispersion profile for each population of galaxies is possible.
  • Orbiting and infalling galaxies have five independent parameters in their velocity dispersion profiles, including three radial scales and two velocity dispersion amplitudes, all correlated with mass.
  • Redundancies in the velocity dispersion profiles allow for nontrivial systematics checks from a single data set, providing valuable insights into galaxy cluster properties and enabling more robust cosmological and astrophysical constraints.
  • Potential applications of this new model include detecting the edge radius of halos and constraining cosmology and astrophysics using upcoming spectroscopic surveys.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Han Aung, Daisuke Nagai, Eduardo Rozo, Brandon Wolfe, Susmita Adhikari

arXiv: 2204.13131v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
10 pages, 11 figures, submitted to MNRAS

Abstract: We present a percent-level accurate model of the line-of-sight velocity distribution of galaxies around dark matter halos as a function of projected radius and halo mass. The model is developed and tested using synthetic galaxy catalogs generated with the UniverseMachine run on the Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations. The model decomposes the galaxies around a cluster into three kinematically distinct classes: orbiting, infalling, and interloping galaxies. We demonstrate that: 1) we can statistically distinguish between these three types of galaxies using only projected line-of-sight velocity information; 2) the halo edge radius inferred from the line-of-sight velocity dispersion is an excellent proxy for the three-dimensional halo edge radius; 3) we can accurately recover the full velocity dispersion profile for each of the three populations of galaxies. Importantly, the velocity dispersion profiles of the orbiting and infalling galaxies contain five independent parameters -- three distinct radial scales and two velocity dispersion amplitudes -- each of which is correlated with mass. Thus, the velocity dispersion profile of galaxy clusters has inherent redundancies that allow us to perform nontrivial systematics check from a single data set. We discuss several potential applications of our new model for detecting the edge radius and constraining cosmology and astrophysics using upcoming spectroscopic surveys.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Apr. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2204.13131v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Aung et al. present a highly accurate model for the line-of-sight velocity distribution of galaxies around dark matter halos. The model is developed and tested using synthetic galaxy catalogs generated with the UniverseMachine run on the Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations. The authors focus on understanding the kinematics of galaxies around clusters and decompose them into three distinct classes: orbiting, infalling, and interloping galaxies. They demonstrate that these three types of galaxies can be statistically distinguished using only projected line-of-sight velocity information. One key finding of their study is that the halo edge radius inferred from the line-of-sight velocity dispersion serves as an excellent proxy for the three-dimensional halo edge radius. This has important implications for accurately determining the spatial extent of dark matter halos. Furthermore, Aung et al. show that they can accurately recover the full velocity dispersion profile for each population of galaxies. Specifically, they find that the velocity dispersion profiles of orbiting and infalling galaxies contain five independent parameters, including three distinct radial scales and two velocity dispersion amplitudes, all of which are correlated with mass. Importantly, these redundancies in the velocity dispersion profiles allow for nontrivial systematics checks from a single data set; this provides valuable insights into galaxy cluster properties and enables more robust cosmological and astrophysical constraints. The authors discuss several potential applications of their new model, including detecting the edge radius of halos and constraining cosmology and astrophysics using upcoming spectroscopic surveys. Overall, this study presents a significant advancement in our understanding of galaxy kinematics around dark matter halos by providing accurate modeling techniques with wide-ranging implications for various areas of astrophysics and cosmology research.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.