Inhomogeneous Galactic Chemical Evolution: Modelling Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies of the Large Magellanic Cloud
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Ryan K. Alexander and colleagues present a novel inhomogeneous chemical evolution model, i-GEtool
- The model is used to study the chemical abundance dispersion in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies
- Ultra-faint dwarf galaxies are among the oldest and most metal-poor in the cosmos and contain no traces of gas at present times but have a high dark matter mass fraction
- Understanding the chemical abundance dispersion in such extreme environments could shed light on the properties of the first generations of stars in the cosmos
- The authors apply their model to two ultra-faint dwarf galaxies, Carina II (Car II) and Reticulum II (Ret II), which are satellites of the Large Magellanic Cloud
- The i-GEtool model is based on Monte Carlo sampling of the initial mass function as star formation proceeds in different gas cells of the simulated galaxy volume
- By focusing on $\alpha$- and odd-$\textit{Z}$ elements, they predict two sequences in [C/Fe] and [N/Fe] at all metallicities
- Their models systematically underestimate [C/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] due to large uncertainties in adopted stellar nucleosynthesis yields
- The authors' Supernova feedback scheme drives galactic outflows that quench star formation activity early on
- The average outflow mass-loading factor predicted by their models is $\approx 10^{3}$
- Synthetic color-magnitude diagrams were drawn for Car II and Ret II and compared with observations
- This study provides valuable insights into understanding chemical evolution of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies while also offering a useful tool for future studies in this area through its application to Carina II (Car II) and Reticulum II (Ret II).
Authors: Ryan K. Alexander, Fiorenzo Vincenzo, Alexander P. Ji, Hannah Richstein, Chris J. Jordan, Brad K. Gibson
Abstract: Ultra-faint dwarf galaxies are among the oldest and most metal-poor galaxies in the cosmos, observed to contain no traces of gas at the present time and a high dark matter mass fraction. Understanding the chemical abundance dispersion in such extreme environments could shed light on the properties of the first generations of stars in the cosmos. We present a novel inhomogeneous chemical evolution model, i-GEtool, that we apply to two ultra-faint dwarf galaxies, Carina II (Car II) and Reticulum II (Ret II), which are satellites of the Large Magellanic Cloud. In summary, our model is based on the Monte Carlo sampling of the initial mass function as star formation proceeds in different gas cells of the simulated galaxy volume. We account for the chemical enrichment of Supernova bubbles as they spread in the interstellar medium, which causes dispersion in the predicted elemental abundances. We recreate the elemental abundance patterns by focusing on $\alpha$- and odd-$\textit{Z}$ elements, predicting two sequences in [C/Fe] and [N/Fe] at all metallicities. Our models systematically underestimate [C/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] because of the large uncertainty in the adopted stellar nucleosynthesis yields. We discuss that the observed C and N abundances had likely been affected by internal mixing processes, which changed the initial surface abundances in the red giants. Our Supernova feedback scheme is responsible for driving galactic outflows, which quench the star formation activity in the simulated galaxies at early times. The average outflow mass-loading factor as predicted by our models is $\approx 10^{3}$, which extrapolates towards very low galaxy stellar masses the trend observed at high stellar masses. Finally, by combining our model with the MIST isochrone database, we draw synthetic colour-magnitude diagrams of Car II and Ret II and compare them to observations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.