A dynamics-based density profile for dark haloes -- II. Fitting function

AI-generated keywords: Dark Matter Haloes Fitting Function Einasto Profile N-body Simulations Cosmologies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors aim to design a more physically motivated fitting function for describing dark matter halo density profiles
  • Utilize profiles that have been dynamically split into orbiting and infalling particles
  • Approach captures shapes of orbiting and infalling terms separately
  • Fitting function should accurately describe profiles in transition region, be flexible, work across all halo masses, redshifts, cosmologies, and accretion rates
  • Propose a five-parameter fitting function based on truncated Einasto profile for orbiting term
  • Infalling profile modeled as power law in overdensity transitioning to constant at halo center
  • Proposed fitting functions fit averaged total profiles in simulations with about 5% accuracy across wide range of parameter space
  • When specific values fixed for α and β (0.18 and 3 respectively), formula becomes three-parameter model that fits individual halos better than Einasto profile on average
  • Simulations used are part of Erebos suite of dissipationless N-body simulations with different box sizes and resolutions covering two ΛCDM cosmologies and four self-similar Einstein-de Sitter universes with power-law initial spectra
  • Simulations run using Gadget2 code, halo identification performed using Rockstar halo finder
  • Paper presents more physically motivated fitting function applicable across various properties such as mass, redshift, cosmology, or accretion rate
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Benedikt Diemer

arXiv: 2205.03420v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
19 pages, 9 figures. Additional figures at http://www.benediktdiemer.com/data
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The density profiles of dark matter haloes are commonly described by fitting functions such as the NFW or Einasto models, but these approximations break down in the transition region where halos become dominated by newly accreting matter. In Paper I we dynamically split simulation particles into orbiting and infalling components and analysed their separate profiles. Here we propose simple, accurate fitting functions designed to capture the asymptotic shapes of the two terms at large and small radii. The orbiting term is described as a truncated Einasto profile, $\rho_{\rm orb} \propto \exp \left[-2/\alpha\ (r / r_{\rm s})^\alpha - 1/\beta\ (r / r_{\rm t})^\beta \right]$, with a five-parameter space of normalization, physically distinct scale and truncation radii, and $\alpha$ and $\beta$, which control how rapidly the profiles steepen. The infalling profile is modelled as a power law in overdensity that smoothly transitions to a constant at the halo centre. We show that these formulae fit the averaged, total profiles in simulations to about 5% accuracy across almost all of an expansive parameter space in halo mass, redshift, cosmology, and accretion rate. When fixing $\alpha = 0.18$ and $\beta = 3$, the formula becomes a three-parameter model for the orbiting term that fits individual halos better than the Einasto profile on average.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.03420v1

In this paper, the authors aim to design a more physically motivated fitting function for describing the density profiles of dark matter haloes. They utilize profiles that have been dynamically split into orbiting and infalling particles, using an algorithm presented in a previous paper (referred to as Paper I). This approach allows them to capture the shapes of the orbiting and infalling terms separately. The authors require that their fitting function accurately describes the profiles even in the transition region, is flexible enough to apply to individual halos and different selection criteria, works across all halo masses, redshifts, cosmologies, and accretion rates, relies on as few free parameters as possible with clear physical interpretations, and exhibits minimal parameter degeneracies. To meet these requirements, the authors propose a five-parameter fitting function based on a truncated Einasto profile for the orbiting term. This profile includes normalization parameters, physically distinct scale and truncation radii, and α and β parameters that control how rapidly the profiles steepen. The infalling profile is modeled as a power law in overdensity that smoothly transitions to a constant at the halo center. The authors demonstrate that their proposed fitting functions fit averaged total profiles in simulations with about 5% accuracy across a wide range of parameter space including halo mass, redshift, cosmology, and accretion rate. When specific values are fixed for α and β (0.18 and 3 respectively), their formula becomes a three-parameter model for the orbiting term that fits individual halos better than the Einasto profile on average. The simulations used in this study are part of the Erebos suite of dissipationless N-body simulations. These simulations consist of 14 runs with different box sizes and resolutions covering two ΛCDM cosmologies (consistent with WMAP7 and Planck) as well as four self-similar Einstein-de Sitter universes with power-law initial spectra. The simulations were run using the Gadget2 code, and halo identification was performed using the Rockstar halo finder. Overall, this paper presents a more physically motivated fitting function for describing dark matter halo density profiles which accurately captures both orbiting and infalling terms while being applicable across various properties such as mass or redshift or cosmology or accretion rate. This work provides an invaluable tool for analyzing observed or simulated density profiles in future studies.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.