Stochastic uncertainty analysis of gravity gradient tensor components and their combinations

AI-generated keywords: Gravity Inversion FTG Devices Gaussian Process Regression Cokriging Subsurface Density Model

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Full Tensor Gravity (FTG) devices measure up to five independent components of the gravity gradient tensor
  • Lack of quantitative understanding on which tensor components are crucial for accurate subsurface density modeling through gravity inversion
  • Researchers proposed a stochastic inversion approach to assess uncertainty associated with tensor components and their combinations
  • Geostatistical inversion techniques based on Gaussian process regression and cokriging were applied
  • Cokriging variances can indicate the relative significance of different tensor components in recovering a subsurface density model
  • The approach was demonstrated using the New Found dataset, showcasing its effectiveness in selecting optimal combinations of tensor components
  • This research contributes to advancing FTG data analysis and its potential applications in geophysics
  • Provides a quantitative framework for assessing uncertainty and identifying important tensor components
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pejman Shamsipour, Amin Aghaee, Tedd Kourkounakis, Shawn Hood

arXiv: 2205.09159v1 - DOI (physics.geo-ph)
26 pages, 10 figures

Abstract: Full tensor gravity (FTG) devices provide up to five independent components of the gravity gradient tensor. However, we do not yet have a quantitative understanding of which tensor components or combinations of components are more important to recover a subsurface density model by gravity inversion. This is mainly because different components may be more appropriate in different scenarios or purposes. Knowledge of these components in different environments can aid with selection of optimal selection of component combinations. In this work, we propose to apply stochastic inversion to assess the uncertainty of gravity gradient tensor components and their combinations. The method is therefore a quantitative approach. The applied method here is based on the geostatistical inversion (Gaussian process regression) concept using cokriging. The cokriging variances (variance function of the GP) are found to be a useful indicator for distinguishing the gravity gradient tensor components. This approach is applied to the New Found dataset to demonstrate its effectiveness in real-world applications.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.09159v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of geophysics, Full Tensor Gravity (FTG) devices have been developed to measure up to five independent components of the gravity gradient tensor. However, there is still a lack of quantitative understanding regarding which specific tensor components or combinations of components are most crucial for accurately recovering a subsurface density model through gravity inversion. This knowledge gap exists because different scenarios and purposes may require different components to be prioritized. To address this issue, a team of researchers led by Pejman Shamsipour proposed a stochastic inversion approach to assess the uncertainty associated with gravity gradient tensor components and their combinations. By applying geostatistical inversion techniques based on Gaussian process regression and cokriging, they aimed to quantitatively analyze the importance of different tensor components in various environments. The researchers found that the cokriging variances, which represent the variance function of the Gaussian process, can serve as useful indicators for distinguishing between different gravity gradient tensor components. These variances provide valuable insights into the relative significance of each component in recovering a subsurface density model. To demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in real-world applications, the team applied it to the New Found dataset. Through this case study, they were able to showcase how their method can aid in selecting optimal combinations of gravity gradient tensor components for accurate subsurface density modeling. Overall, this research contributes significantly to advancing our understanding of FTG data analysis and its potential applications in geophysics. By providing a quantitative framework for assessing uncertainty and identifying important tensor components, this work offers valuable insights for future studies aiming to improve gravity inversion techniques and enhance subsurface imaging capabilities.
Created on 27 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.